Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals

Smith, P., Adams, J., Beerling, D. J., Beringer, T., Calvin, K. V., Fuss, S., Griscom, B., Hagemann, N., Kammann, C., Kraxner, F., Minx, J. C., Popp, A., Renforth, P., Vicente, J. L. V., Keesstra, S. (2019): Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals. - Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 255-286.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
8536.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 720KB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
8536.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Smith, P.1, Autor
Adams, J.1, Autor
Beerling, D. J.1, Autor
Beringer, T.1, Autor
Calvin, K. V.1, Autor
Fuss, S.1, Autor
Griscom, B.1, Autor
Hagemann, N.1, Autor
Kammann, C.1, Autor
Kraxner, F.1, Autor
Minx, J. C.1, Autor
Popp, Alexander2, Autor              
Renforth, P.1, Autor
Vicente, J. L. V.1, Autor
Keesstra, S.1, Autor
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal (GGR) include afforestation or reforestation (AR), wetland restoration, soil carbon sequestration (SCS), biochar, terrestrial enhanced weathering (TEW), and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). We assess the opportunities and risks associated with these options through the lens of their potential impacts on ecosystem services (Nature's Contributions to People; NCPs) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We find that all land-based GGR options contribute positively to at least some NCPs and SDGs. Wetland restoration and SCS almost exclusively deliver positive impacts. A few GGR options, such as afforestation, BECCS, and biochar potentially impact negatively some NCPs and SDGs, particularly when implemented at scale, largely through competition for land. For those that present risks or are least understood, more research is required, and demonstration projects need to proceed with caution. For options that present low risks and provide cobenefits, implementation can proceed more rapidly following no-regrets principles.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2019
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
eDoc: 8536
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: Ecosystems
Research topic keyword: Mitigation
Research topic keyword: Sustainable Development
Regional keyword: Global
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Working Group: Land-Use Management
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 44 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 255 - 286 Identifikator: -