English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process

Müller-Hansen, F., Lee, Y. T., Callaghan, M., Jankin, S., Minx, J. C. (2022): The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process. - Energy Policy, 169, 113178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113178

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Müller-Hansen, Finn1, Author              
Lee, Yuan Ting2, Author
Callaghan, Max2, Author
Jankin, Slava2, Author
Minx, Jan C.2, Author
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Phasing out coal is a prerequisite to achieving the Paris climate mitigation targets. In 2018, the German government established a multi-stakeholder commission with the mandate to negotiate a plan for the national coal phase-out, fueling a continued public debate over the future of coal. This study analyzes the German coal debate on Twitter before, during, and after the session of the so-called Coal Commission, over a period of three years. In particular, we investigate whether and how the work of the commission translated into shared perceptions and sentiments in the public debate on Twitter. We find that the sentiment of the German coal debate on Twitter becomes increasingly negative over time. In addition, the sentiment becomes more polarized over time due to an increase in the use of more negative and positive language. The analysis of retweet networks shows no increase in interactions between communities over time. These findings suggest that the Coal Commission did not further consensus in the coal debate on Twitter. While the debate on social media only represents a section of the national debate, it provides insights for policy-makers to evaluate the interaction of multi-stakeholder commissions and public debates.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-08-072022-10
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113178
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Regional keyword: Germany
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Energy Policy
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 169 Sequence Number: 113178 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/energy-policy
Publisher: Elsevier