English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage

Schmidt, H.-P., Anca-Couce, A., Hagemann, N., Werner, C., Gerten, D., Lucht, W., Kammann, C. (2019): Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage. - Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 11, 4, 573-591.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12553

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
8186oa.pdf (Publisher version), 753KB
Name:
8186oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Schmidt, H.-P.1, Author
Anca-Couce, A.1, Author
Hagemann, N.1, Author
Werner, Constanze2, Author              
Gerten, Dieter2, Author              
Lucht, Wolfgang2, Author              
Kammann, C.1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The growth of biomass is considered the most efficient method currently available to extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, biomass carbon is easily degraded by microorganisms releasing it in the form of greenhouse gases back to the atmosphere. If biomass is pyrolyzed, the organic carbon is converted into solid (biochar), liquid (bio‐oil), and gaseous (permanent pyrogas) carbonaceous products. During the last decade, biochar has been discussed as a promising option to improve soil fertility and sequester carbon, although the carbon efficiency of the thermal conversion of biomass into biochar is in the range of 30%–50% only. So far, the liquid and gaseous pyrolysis products were mainly considered for combustion, though they can equally be processed into recalcitrant forms suitable for carbon sequestration. In this review, we show that pyrolytic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS) can aspire for carbon sequestration efficiencies of >70%, which is shown to be an important threshold to allow PyCCS to become a relevant negative emission technology. Prolonged residence times of pyrogenic carbon can be generated (a) within the terrestrial biosphere including the agricultural use of biochar; (b) within advanced bio‐based materials as long as they are not oxidized (biochar, bio‐oil); and (c) within suitable geological deposits (bio‐oil and CO2 from permanent pyrogas oxidation). While pathway (c) would need major carbon taxes or similar governmental incentives to become a realistic option, pathways (a) and (b) create added economic value and could at least partly be implemented without other financial incentives. Pyrolysis technology is already well established, biochar sequestration and bio‐oil sequestration in soils, respectively biomaterials, do not present ecological hazards, and global scale‐up appears feasible within a time frame of 10–30 years. Thus, PyCCS could evolve into a decisive tool for global carbon governance, serving climate change mitigation and the sustainable development goals simultaneously.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2019
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12553
PIKDOMAIN: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
eDoc: 8186
Research topic keyword: CO2 Removal
Model / method: Transfer (Knowledge&Technology)
Organisational keyword: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
Working Group: Terrestrial Safe Operating Space
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, GCB bioenergy
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 11 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 573 - 591 Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/140715