English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets

Windisch, M. G., Humpenöder, F., Merfort, L., Bauer, N., Luderer, G., Dietrich, J. P., Heinke, J., Müller, C., Abrahão, G. M., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A. (2025): Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets. - Nature Communications, 16, 2460.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
31964oa.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
31964oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14772621 (Supplementary material)
Description:
Model Output and Results

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Windisch, Michael G.1, Author              
Humpenöder, Florian1, Author              
Merfort, Leon1, Author              
Bauer, Nicolas1, Author              
Luderer, Gunnar1, Author              
Dietrich, Jan Philipp1, Author              
Heinke, Jens1, Author              
Müller, Christoph1, Author              
Abrahão, Gabriel Medeiros1, Author              
Lotze-Campen, Hermann1, Author              
Popp, Alexander1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Achieving the Paris Agreement’s CO2 emission reduction goals heavily relies on enhancing carbon storage and sequestration in forests globally. Yet, the increasing vulnerability of carbon stored in forests to both climate change and human intervention is often neglected in current mitigation strategies. Our study explores modelled interactions between key emission sectors, indicating that accelerated decarbonization could meet climate objectives despite forest carbon losses due to disturbances. However, delaying action on forest carbon loss by just five years consistently doubles the additional mitigation costs and efforts across key sectors, regardless of the assessed forest disturbance rates. Moreover, these myopic responses to forest carbon loss are as stringent, or even more demanding, than immediate responses to twice the forest disturbance rate. Our results underline the urgent need to monitor and safeguard forests for the economic feasibility of the Paris Agreement’s climate goals.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-05-212025-02-202025-03-272025-03-27
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 10
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Working Group: Land Biosphere Dynamics
Organisational keyword: Lab - Land Use Transition
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Working Group: Integrated Assessment Modelling
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Research topic keyword: CO2 Removal
Research topic keyword: Forest
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: Mitigation
Regional keyword: Global
Model / method: LPJmL
Model / method: MAgPIE
Model / method: REMIND
MDB-ID: No MDB - stored outside PIK (see locators/paper)
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Nature Communications
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 16 Sequence Number: 2460 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals354
Publisher: Nature