English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites

Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., Reyer, C. P. O., Gutsch, M., Kollas, C., Badeck, F.-W., Bugmann, H. K. M., Grote, R., Fürstenau, C., Lindner, M., Schaber, J. (2020): Description and evaluation of the process-based forest model 4C v2.2 at four European forest sites. - Geoscientific Model Development, 13, 11, 5311-5343.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
24497oa.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
24497oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Lasch-Born, Petra1, Author              
Suckow, Felicitas1, Author              
Reyer, Christopher P. O.1, Author              
Gutsch, Martin1, Author              
Kollas, Chris1, Author              
Badeck, Franz-Werner2, Author
Bugmann, Harald K. M.2, Author
Grote, Rüdiger2, Author
Fürstenau, Cornelia2, Author
Lindner, Marcus, Author
Schaber, Jörg2, Author
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The process-based model 4C (FORESEE) has been developed over the past twenty years. The objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive description of the main features of 4C and to present an evaluation of the model at four different forest sites across Europe. The evaluation was focused on growth parameters, carbon, water and heat fluxes. The main data source for the evaluation was the PROFOUND database. We applied different statistical metrics of evaluation and compared the inter-annual and inter-monthly variability of observed and simulated carbon and water fluxes. The ability to reproduce forest growth differs from site to site and is best for the pine stand site Peitz. The model's performance in simulating carbon and water fluxes was very satisfactory on daily and monthly time scales in contrast to the annual time scale. This underlines the conclusion that processes that are either not represented in dependence on on medium- to long-term dynamic influences such as allocation, or those that are not represented at all but may have a large impact at specific sites – such as the dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) and ground vegetation growth – need to be elaborated for general forest growth investigations under climate change. On the other hand, 4C has shown a great potential for improvement since it emphasizes the representation of boundary conditions such as soil temperature at different depths. Therefore, more spatial differentiation of processes such as organ-specific respiration should easily be accomplished. Nonetheless, by using the PROFOUND database we were able to demonstrate the applicability and reliability of 4C.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-09-052020-11-30
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: MDB-ID: No data to archive
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-5311-2020
Research topic keyword: Biodiversity
Research topic keyword: Climate impacts
Research topic keyword: Ecosystems
Regional keyword: Brandenburg
Regional keyword: Europe
Regional keyword: Germany
Model / method: 4C
Working Group: Forest and Ecosystem Resilience
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Geoscientific Model Development
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 13 (11) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 5311 - 5343 Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals185
Publisher: Copernicus