English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility

Harmsen, M., Tabak, C., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Humpenöder, F., Purohit, P., van Vuuren, D. (2023): Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility. - Nature Communications, 14, 2949.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38577-4

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
s41467-023-38577-4.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
s41467-023-38577-4.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Harmsen, Mathijs1, Author
Tabak, Charlotte1, Author
Höglund-Isaksson, Lena1, Author
Humpenöder, Florian2, Author              
Purohit, Pallav1, Author
van Vuuren, Detlef1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Despite its projected crucial role in stringent, future global climate policy, non-CO2 greenhouse gas (NCGG) mitigation remains a large uncertain factor in climate research. A revision of the estimated mitigation potential has implications for the feasibility of global climate policy to reach the Paris Agreement climate goals. Here, we provide a systematic bottom-up estimate of the total uncertainty in NCGG mitigation, by developing ‘optimistic’, ‘default’ and ‘pessimistic’ long-term NCGG marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves, based on a comprehensive literature review of mitigation options. The global 1.5-degree climate target is found to be out of reach under pessimistic MAC assumptions, as is the 2-degree target under high emission assumptions. In a 2-degree scenario, MAC uncertainty translates into a large projected range in relative NCGG reduction (40–58%), carbon budget (±120 Gt CO2) and policy costs (±16%). Partly, the MAC uncertainty signifies a gap that could be bridged by human efforts, but largely it indicates uncertainty in technical limitations.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-12-062023-05-092023-06-022023-06-02
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 14
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Food & Agriculture
Research topic keyword: Mitigation
MDB-ID: No data to archive
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38577-4
Working Group: Land-Use Management
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Nature Communications
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 14 Sequence Number: 2949 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals354
Publisher: Nature