Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Archetype analysis in sustainability research: methodological portfolio and analytical frontiers

Sietz, D., Frey, U., Roggero, M., Gong, Y., Magliocca, N., Tan, R., Janssen, P., Vaclavik, T. (2019): Archetype analysis in sustainability research: methodological portfolio and analytical frontiers. - Ecology and Society, 24, 3, 34.
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11103-240334

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
8619oa.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
8619oa.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Sietz, Diana1, Autor              
Frey, U.2, Autor
Roggero, M.2, Autor
Gong, Y.2, Autor
Magliocca, N.2, Autor
Tan, R.2, Autor
Janssen, P.2, Autor
Vaclavik, T.2, Autor
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: In sustainability research, archetype analysis reveals patterns of factors and processes that repeatedly shape social-ecological systems. These patterns help improve our understanding of global concerns, including vulnerability, land management, food security, and governance. During the last decade, the portfolio of methods used to investigate archetypes has been growing rapidly. However, these methods differ widely in their epistemological and normative underpinnings, data requirements, and suitability to address particular research purposes. Therefore, guidance is needed for systematically choosing methods in archetype analysis. We synthesize strengths and weaknesses of key methods used to identify archetypes. Demonstrating that there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach, we discuss advantages and shortcomings of a range of methods for archetype analysis in sustainability research along gradients that capture the treatment of causality, normativity, spatial variations, and temporal dynamics. Based on this discussion, we highlight seven analytical frontiers that bear particular potential for tackling methodological limitations. As a milestone in archetype analysis, our synthesis supports researchers in reflecting on methodological implications, including opportunities and limitations related to causality, normativity, space, and time considerations in view of specific purposes and research questions. This enables innovative research designs in future archetype analysis, thereby contributing to the advancement of sustainability research and decision-making.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2019
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.5751/ES-11103-240334
PIKDOMAIN: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
eDoc: 8619
Research topic keyword: Nonlinear Dynamics
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: Inequality and Equity
Research topic keyword: Sustainable Development
Model / method: Nonlinear Data Analysis
Model / method: Qualitative Methods
Model / method: Transfer (Knowledge&Technology)
Regional keyword: Global
Regional keyword: Africa
Organisational keyword: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
Working Group: Ecosystems in Transition
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Ecology and Society
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 24 (3) Artikelnummer: 34 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/201606291