English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Differential programming for Earth system modeling

Authors
/persons/resource/gelbrecht

Gelbrecht,  Maximilian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/alistair.white

White,  Alistair
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/sebastian.bathiany

Bathiany,  Sebastian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Niklas.Boers

Boers,  Niklas
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

28457oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 825KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Gelbrecht, M., White, A., Bathiany, S., Boers, N. (2023): Differential programming for Earth system modeling. - Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 11, 3123-3135.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3123-2023


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28457
Abstract
Earth system models (ESMs) are the primary tools for investigating future Earth system states at timescales from decades to centuries, especially in response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas release. State-of-the-art ESMs can reproduce the observational global mean temperature anomalies of the last 150 years. Nevertheless, ESMs need further improvements, most importantly regarding (i) the large spread in their estimates of climate sensitivity, i.e., the temperature response to increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases; (ii) the modeled spatial patterns of key variables such as temperature and precipitation; (iii) their representation of extreme weather events; and (iv) their representation of multistable Earth system components and the ability to predict associated abrupt transitions. Here, we argue that making ESMs automatically differentiable has a huge potential to advance ESMs, especially with respect to these key shortcomings. First, automatic differentiability would allow objective calibration of ESMs, i.e., the selection of optimal values with respect to a cost function for a large number of free parameters, which are currently tuned mostly manually. Second, recent advances in machine learning (ML) and in the number, accuracy, and resolution of observational data promise to be helpful with at least some of the above aspects because ML may be used to incorporate additional information from observations into ESMs. Automatic differentiability is an essential ingredient in the construction of such hybrid models, combining process-based ESMs with ML components. We document recent work showcasing the potential of automatic differentiation for a new generation of substantially improved, data-informed ESMs.