English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era

Authors
/persons/resource/Xiaoran.Li

Li,  Xiaoran
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

He,  Shutong
External Organizations;

Gu,  Yuen
External Organizations;

Sun,  Yixian
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

s44168-025-00233-6.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Li, X., He, S., Gu, Y., Sun, Y. (2025): Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era. - npj Climate Action, 4, 30.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00233-6


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32177
Abstract
As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China would make important contributions to the achievement of the Paris goals if it made economy-wide, strong policy interventions to combat climate change. Despite a growing number of studies on China’s climate governance, the overall landscape of China’s climate policy and its key characteristics remain underexamined. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a dataset of 358 climate-related policies adopted by China’s central government in 2016–2022 and assessed key policy mix characteristics including policy density, balance and intensity. Our findings reveal that higher policy density does not equate to stronger action. Significant variation also exists in alignment with China’s Nationally Determined Contributions, especially in high-emitting sectors. Moreover, despite a relatively balanced mix of regulatory, economic, and informational instruments, this balance does not guarantee intensity. Our study shows challenges in China’s policy coherence and calls for stronger mechanisms to integrate national goals into sectoral policies.