English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Global bilateral migration projections accounting for diasporas, transit and return flows, and poverty constraints

Authors
/persons/resource/Schewe

Schewe,  Jacob
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/albano.rikani

Rikani,  Albano
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

25431oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 33MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schewe, J., Rikani, A. (2021): Global bilateral migration projections accounting for diasporas, transit and return flows, and poverty constraints. - Demographic Research, 45, 4, 87-140.
https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.4


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_25431
Abstract
Background: Anticipating changes in international migration patterns is useful for demographic studies and for designing policies that support the well-being of those involved. Existing forecasting methods do not account for a number of stylized facts that emerge from large-scale migration observations and theories: existing migrant communities – diasporas – act to lower migration costs and thereby provide a mechanism of self-amplification; return migration and transit migration are important components of global migration flows; and poverty constrains emigration. Objective: Here we present hindcasts and future projections of international migration that explicitly account for these nonlinear features. Methods: We develop a dynamic model that simulates migration flows by origin, destination, and place of birth. We calibrate the model using recently constructed global datasets of bilateral migration. Results: We show that the model reproduces past patterns and trends well based only on initial migrant stocks and changes in national incomes. We then project migration flows under future scenarios of global socioeconomic development. Conclusions: Different assumptions about income levels and between-country inequality lead to markedly different migration trajectories, with migration flows either converging towards net zero if incomes in presently poor countries catch up with the rest of the world; or remaining high or even rising throughout the 21st century if economic development is slower and more unequal. Importantly, diasporas induce significant inertia and sizable return migration flows. Contribution: Our simulation model provides a versatile tool for assessing the impacts of different socioeconomic futures on international migration, accounting for important nonlinearities in migration drivers and flows.