日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data

Hänsel, M. C., Franks, R. M., Kalkuhl, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2022). Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 116:. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102730.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
1-s2.0-S0095069622000833-main.pdf (出版社版), 2MB
ファイル名:
1-s2.0-S0095069622000833-main.pdf
説明:
-
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Hänsel, Martin C.1, 著者              
Franks, R. Maximilian1, 著者              
Kalkuhl, Matthias2, 著者
Edenhofer, Ottmar1, 著者              
所属:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: Carbon price, Optimal taxation, Horizontal equity, Redistribution, Clean energy subsidies, Climate policy, Just transition
 要旨: We develop a model of optimal taxation and redistribution under an ambitious climate target. We take into account vertical income differences, but also explicitly capture horizontal equity concerns by considering heterogeneous energy efficiencies. By deriving first- and second-best rules for policy instruments including carbon and labor taxes, transfers and energy subsidies, we investigate analytically how vertical and horizontal inequality is considered in the welfare maximizing tax structure. We calibrate the model to German household data and a 30 percent emission reduction goal and show that redistribution of carbon tax revenues via household-specific transfers is the first-best policy. Under plausible assumptions on inequality aversion, transfers to energy-intensive households should be about five times higher than transfers to energy-efficient households. Equal per-capita transfers do not require to observe households’ efficiency type, but increase equity-weighted mitigation costs by around 5 percent compared to the first-best. Mitigation costs increase by less, if the government can implement a uniform clean energy subsidy or household-specific tax-subsidy schemes on energy consumption and labor income that target heterogeneous energy efficiencies. Horizontal equity concerns may therefore constitute a new second-best rationale for clean energy policies or differentiated energy taxes.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - 英語
 日付: 2021-02-262022-09-092022-10-13
 出版の状態: Finally published
 ページ: 26
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102730
MDB-ID: No data to archive
PIKDOMAIN: Director / Executive Staff / Science & Society
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Organisational keyword: Director Edenhofer
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Research topic keyword: Carbon Pricing
Research topic keyword: Inequality and Equity
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
OATYPE: Hybrid Open Access
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
種別: 学術雑誌, SCI, Scopus
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 116 通巻号: 102730 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journal-of-environmental-economics-and-management
Publisher: Elsevier