English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data

Authors
/persons/resource/Martin.Haensel

Hänsel,  Martin C.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/franks

Franks,  R. Maximilian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Kalkuhl,  Matthias
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

1-s2.0-S0095069622000833-main.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hänsel, M. C., Franks, R. M., Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O. (2022): Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data. - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 116, 102730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102730


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_27721
Abstract
We develop a model of optimal taxation and redistribution under an ambitious climate target. We take into account vertical income differences, but also explicitly capture horizontal equity concerns by considering heterogeneous energy efficiencies. By deriving first- and second-best rules for policy instruments including carbon and labor taxes, transfers and energy subsidies, we investigate analytically how vertical and horizontal inequality is considered in the welfare maximizing tax structure. We calibrate the model to German household data and a 30 percent emission reduction goal and show that redistribution of carbon tax revenues via household-specific transfers is the first-best policy. Under plausible assumptions on inequality aversion, transfers to energy-intensive households should be about five times higher than transfers to energy-efficient households. Equal per-capita transfers do not require to observe households’ efficiency type, but increase equity-weighted mitigation costs by around 5 percent compared to the first-best. Mitigation costs increase by less, if the government can implement a uniform clean energy subsidy or household-specific tax-subsidy schemes on energy consumption and labor income that target heterogeneous energy efficiencies. Horizontal equity concerns may therefore constitute a new second-best rationale for clean energy policies or differentiated energy taxes.