日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  2°C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall?

von Stechow, C., Minx., J. C., Riahi, K., Jewell, J., McCollum, D. L., Callaghan, M. W., Bertram, C., Luderer, G., & Baiocchi, G. (2016). 2°C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? Environmental Research Letters, 11:. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
7317oa.pdf (全文テキスト(全般)), 814KB
ファイル名:
7317oa.pdf
説明:
-
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
von Stechow, Christoph1, 著者              
Minx., Jan C.1, 著者              
Riahi, K.2, 著者
Jewell, J.2, 著者
McCollum, D. L.2, 著者
Callaghan, M. W.2, 著者
Bertram, Christoph1, 著者              
Luderer, Gunnar1, 著者              
Baiocchi, G.2, 著者
所属:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the new international climate treaty could put 2015 into the history books as a defining year for setting human development on a more sustainable pathway. The global climate policy and SDG agendas are highly interconnected: the way that the climate problem is addressed strongly affects the prospects of meeting numerous other SDGs and vice versa. Drawing on existing scenario results from a recent energy-economy-climate model inter-comparison project, this letter analyses these synergies and (risk) trade-offs of alternative 2 °C pathways across indicators relevant for energy-related SDGs and sustainable energy objectives. We find that limiting the availability of key mitigation technologies yields some co-benefits and decreases risks specific to these technologies but greatly increases many others. Fewer synergies and substantial trade-offs across SDGs are locked into the system for weak short-term climate policies that are broadly in line with current Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), particularly when combined with constraints on technologies. Lowering energy demand growth is key to managing these trade-offs and creating synergies across multiple energy-related SD dimensions. We argue that SD considerations are central for choosing socially acceptable 2 °C pathways: the prospects of meeting other SDGs need not dwindle and can even be enhanced for some goals if appropriate climate policy choices are made. Progress on the climate policy and SDG agendas should therefore be tracked within a unified framework.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2016
 出版の状態: Finally published
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022
PIKDOMAIN: Sustainable Solutions - Research Domain III
eDoc: 7317
Research topic keyword: Sustainable Development
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Research topic keyword: CO2 Removal
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Model / method: REMIND
Model / method: Model Intercomparison
Regional keyword: Global
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Working Group: Energy Systems
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Environmental Research Letters
種別: 学術雑誌, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 11 通巻号: 34022 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/150326