日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  Extending near-term emissions scenarios to assess warming implications of Paris Agreement NDCs

Gütschow, J., Jeffery, M. L., Schaeffer, M., & Hare, B. (2018). Extending near-term emissions scenarios to assess warming implications of Paris Agreement NDCs. Earth's Future, 6(9), 1242-1259. doi:10.1002/2017EF000781.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
8058oa.pdf (出版社版), 16MB
ファイル名:
8058oa.pdf
説明:
-
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Gütschow, Johannes1, 著者              
Jeffery, M. Louise1, 著者              
Schaeffer, M.2, 著者
Hare, B.2, 著者
所属:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: In the Paris Agreement countries have agreed to act together to hold global warming well below 2°C over preindustrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C. To assess if the world is on track to meet this long‐term temperature goal, countries' pledged emissions reductions (Nationally Determined Contributions, NDCs) need to be analyzed for their implied warming. Several research groups and nongovernmental organizations have estimated this warming and arrived at very different results but have invariably concluded that the current pledges are inadequate to hold warming below 2°C, let alone 1.5°C. In this paper we analyze different methods to estimate 2100 global mean temperature rise implied by countries' NDCs, which often only specify commitments until 2030. We present different methods to extend near‐term emissions pathways that have been developed by the authors or used by different research groups and nongovernmental organizations to estimate 21st century warming consequences of Paris Agreement commitments. The abilities of these methods to project both low and high warming scenarios in line with the scenario literature is assessed. We find that the simpler methods are not suitable for temperature projections while more complex methods can produce results consistent with the energy and economic scenario literature. We further find that some methods can have a strong high or low temperature bias depending on parameter choices. The choice of methods to evaluate the consistency of aggregated NDC commitments is very important for reviewing progress toward the Paris Agreement's long‐term temperature goal.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2018
 出版の状態: Finally published
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000781
PIKDOMAIN: Climate Impacts & Vulnerabilities - Research Domain II
eDoc: 8058
Research topic keyword: Mitigation
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Model / method: MAGICC
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Working Group: Event-based modeling of economic impacts of climate change
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Earth's Future
種別: 学術雑誌, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 6 (9) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 1242 - 1259 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/170925