English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Marine carbon dioxide removal by alkalinization should no longer be overlooked

Kowalczyk, K. A., Amann, T., Strefler, J., Vorrath, M.-E., Hartmann, J., De Marco, S., Renforth, P., Foteinis, S., Kriegler, E. (2024): Marine carbon dioxide removal by alkalinization should no longer be overlooked. - Environmental Research Letters, 19, 7, 074033.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5192

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
30363oa.pdf (Publisher version), 723KB
Name:
30363oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Kowalczyk, Katarzyna Anna1, 2, Author              
Amann, Thorben3, Author
Strefler, Jessica1, Author              
Vorrath, Maria-Elena3, Author
Hartmann, Jens3, Author
De Marco, Serena3, Author
Renforth, Phil3, Author
Foteinis, Spyros3, Author
Kriegler, Elmar1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_29970              
3External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: To achieve the Paris climate target, deep emissions reductions have to be complemented with carbon dioxide removal (CDR). However, a portfolio of CDR options is necessary to reduce risks and potential negative side effects. Despite a large theoretical potential, ocean-based CDR such as ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) has been omitted in climate change mitigation scenarios so far. In this study, we provide a techno-economic assessment of large-scale OAE using hydrated lime ('ocean liming'). We address key uncertainties that determine the overall cost of ocean liming (OL) such as the CO2 uptake efficiency per unit of material, distribution strategies avoiding carbonate precipitation which would compromise efficiency, and technology availability (e.g., solar calciners). We find that at economic costs of 130–295 $/tCO2 net-removed, ocean liming could be a competitive CDR option which could make a significant contribution towards the Paris climate target. As the techno-economic assessment identified no showstoppers, we argue for more research on ecosystem impacts, governance, monitoring, reporting, and verification, and technology development and assessment to determine whether ocean liming and other OAE should be considered as part of a broader CDR portfolio.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-06-172024-06-17
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 11
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad5192
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Working Group: Energy Systems
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: CO2 Removal
Research topic keyword: Oceans
Research topic keyword: Mitigation
MDB-ID: No data to archive
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Research Letters
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 19 (7) Sequence Number: 074033 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/150326
Publisher: IOP Publishing