Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget: A multi-model assessment

Abrell, J., Bilici, S., Blesl, M., Fahl, U., Kattelmann, F., Kittel, L., Kosch, M., Luderer, G., Marmullaku, D., Pahle, M., Pietzcker, R. C., Rodrigues, R., Siegle, J. (2024): Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget: A multi-model assessment. - Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101271

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
1-s2.0-S2211467X23002213-main.pdf (Verlagsversion), 4MB
Name:
1-s2.0-S2211467X23002213-main.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Abrell, Jan1, Autor
Bilici, Süheyb1, Autor
Blesl, Markus1, Autor
Fahl, Ulrich1, Autor
Kattelmann, Felix1, Autor
Kittel, Lena1, Autor
Kosch, Mirjam2, Autor              
Luderer, Gunnar2, Autor              
Marmullaku, Drin1, Autor
Pahle, Michael2, Autor              
Pietzcker, Robert C.2, Autor              
Rodrigues, Renato2, Autor              
Siegle, Jonathan1, Autor
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) moves atmospheric carbon to geological or land-based sinks. In a first-best setting, the optimal use of CDR is achieved by a removal subsidy that equals the optimal carbon tax and marginal damages. We derive second-best policy rules for CDR subsidies and carbon taxes when no global carbon price exists but a national government implements a unilateral climate policy. We find that the optimal carbon tax differs from an optimal CDR subsidy because of carbon leakage and a balance of resource trade effect. First, the optimal removal subsidy tends to be larger than the carbon tax because of lower supply-side leakage on fossil resource markets. Second, net carbon exporters exacerbate this wedge to increase producer surplus of their carbon resource producers, implying even larger removal subsidies. Third, net carbon importers may set their removal subsidy even below their carbon tax when marginal environmental damages are small, to appropriate producer surplus from carbon exporters.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2022-06-292023-12-012023-12-112024-01-01
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 7
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101271
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Working Group: Climate & Energy Policy
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Model / method: Model Intercomparison
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
Model / method: REMIND
Regional keyword: Europe
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Carbon Pricing
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Research topic keyword: Decarbonization
Research topic keyword: Economics
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden: ausblenden:
Projektname : ARIADNE
Grant ID : 03SFK5A
Förderprogramm : -
Förderorganisation : -

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Energy Strategy Reviews
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 51 Artikelnummer: 101271 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/energy-strategy-reviews
Publisher: Elsevier