Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Optimal Carbon Taxation and Horizontal Equity: A Welfare-Theoretic Approach with Application to German Household Data

Hänsel, M. C., Franks, R. M., Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O. (2021): Optimal Carbon Taxation and Horizontal Equity: A Welfare-Theoretic Approach with Application to German Household Data, (CESifo Working Paper ; 8931), Munich : CESifo, 51 p.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
cesifo1_wp8931.pdf (Verlagsversion), 533KB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
cesifo1_wp8931.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp8931.pdf (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
-

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hänsel, Martin C.1, Autor              
Franks, R. Maximilian1, Autor              
Kalkuhl, Matthias2, Autor
Edenhofer, Ottmar1, Autor              
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: carbon price, horizontal equity, redistribution, renewable energy subsidies, climate policy, just transition
 Zusammenfassung: We develop a model of optimal carbon taxation and redistribution taking into account horizontal equity concerns by considering heterogeneous energy efficiencies. By deriving first- and second-best rules for policy instruments including carbon taxes, transfers and energy subsidies, we then investigate analytically how horizontal equity is considered in the social welfare maximizing tax structure. We calibrate the model to German household data and a 30 percent emission reduction goal. Our results show that energy-intensive households should receive more redistributive resources than energy-efficient households if and only if social inequality aversion is sufficiently high. We further find that redistribution of carbon tax revenue via household-specific transfers is the first-best policy. Equal per-capita transfers do not suffer from informational problems, but increase mitigation costs by around 15 percent compared to the first-best for unity inequality aversion. Adding renewable energy subsidies or non-linear energy subsidies, reduces mitigation costs further without relying on observability of households’ energy efficiency.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2021-03-01
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 51
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Munich : CESifo
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: PIKDOMAIN: Director / Executive Staff / Science & Society
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Organisational keyword: Director Edenhofer
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Research topic keyword: Economics
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: CESifo Working Paper
Genre der Quelle: Reihe
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 8931 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -