English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Combining participatory, qualitative and quantitative methods for impact assessment of food value chains into an integrated framework

König, H. J., Graef, F., Schindler, J., Fasse, A., Mutabazi, K. D., Lambert, C., Ngwenya, P., Uckert, G., Mahoo, H., Hattermann, F. F., Sieber, S. (2017): Combining participatory, qualitative and quantitative methods for impact assessment of food value chains into an integrated framework. - Food Security, 9, 6, 1309-1321.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0739-2

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
7818.pdf (Any fulltext), 1012KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
7818.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
König, H. J.1, Author
Graef, F.1, Author
Schindler, J.1, Author
Fasse, A.1, Author
Mutabazi, K. D.1, Author
Lambert, C.1, Author
Ngwenya, P.1, Author
Uckert, G.1, Author
Mahoo, H.1, Author
Hattermann, Fred Fokko2, Author              
Sieber, S.1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: An impact assessment of food-securing upgrading strategies (UPS) can be performed to assess actual and potential UPS effects at the local level. We developed an assessment framework that integrates the main components of the food value chain (FVC), including natural resources, food production, processing, marketing, and consumption. The framework provides a generic template in which different impact assessment approaches can be complementarily integrated and was tested for a case study in Tanzania. The framework employs a structured sequence of steps: (1) context analysis and the development of UPS, (2) the selection and application of assessment approaches and (3) the establishment of food security criteria and UPS effects. To illustrate the flexibility and use of the framework, the inputs of three different impact assessment approaches were considered. First, data from a household survey was applied to provide baseline information at the local level. Second, scientific knowledge was employed to systematically assess the selected UPS. Third, local stakeholder knowledge was considered to identify the local food security constraints and preferences and provide assessments of potential UPS effects. The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) approach was utilized to conduct local focus group discussions, and the Scaling Up Assessment Tool for Food Security (ScalA-FS) was employed to gather scientific knowledge about specific UPS impacts. Based on the preliminary results from the framework testing, diverse stakeholder participation was found to be essential for considering local preferences and to engage stakeholders in the assessment process, whereas scientific knowledge and monitoring data were needed to complement the “local picture” with more quantifiable results. The strengths and shortcomings of the framework are discussed.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2017
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s12571-017-0739-2
PIKDOMAIN: Climate Impacts & Vulnerabilities - Research Domain II
eDoc: 7818
Working Group: Hydroclimatic Risks
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Food Security
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 9 (6) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1309 - 1321 Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/food-security