???ENUM_LANGUAGE_JA???
 
???mainMenu_lnkPrivacyPolicy??? ???mainMenu_lnkPolicy???

???ViewItemPage???

???ViewItemFull_lblItemActions??????List_lblExportOptions???
???ViewItemFull_lblAddToBasket???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderLocalTags??????ViewItemFull_btnItemVersions??????ViewItemFull_btnItemView??????ViewItemOverview_lblLinkOverviewPage???
  Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators

Krause, A., Pugh, T. A. M., Bayer, A. D., Doelman, J. C., Humpenöder, F., Anthoni, P., Olin, S., Bodirsky, B. L., Popp, A., Stehfest, E., Arneth, A. (2017): Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators. - Biogeosciences, 14, 21, 4829-4850.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017

Item is

 

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup??? ???ViewItemFull_lblAll??? ???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup??? ???ViewItemFull_lblAll???

???ViewItemFull_lblBasic???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup??? ???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblCiteItemAs???: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22030 ???ViewItemFull_lblCiteItemVersionAs???: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22030_6
???ViewItemFull_lblGenre???: ???ENUM_GENRE_ARTICLE???

???ViewItemMedium_lblSubHeaderFile???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup??? ???ViewItemMedium_lblSubHeaderFile???
???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup??? ???ViewItemMedium_lblSubHeaderFile???
:
7841oa.pdf (???ENUM_CONTENTCATEGORY_publisher-version???), 4???ViewItemMedium_lblFileSizeMB???
???ViewItemFull_lblViewFulltext???   ???save???
???ViewItemFull_lblCiteFileAs???:
https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22030_1/component/file_22031/7841oa.pdf
???ViewItemMedium_lblFileName???:
7841oa.pdf
???ViewItemMedium_lblFileDescription???:
???lbl_noEntry???
???ViewItemMedium_lblFileOaSatus???:
???ViewItemMedium_lblFileVisibility???:
???ENUM_VISIBILITY_PUBLIC???
???ViewItemFull_lblFileMimeTypeSize???:
application/pdf / [MD5]
???ViewItemFull_lblTechnicalMetadata???:
???ViewItemFull_lblViewFulltext???
???ViewItem_lblCopyrightDate???:
???lbl_noEntry???
???ViewItem_lblCopyrightInfo???:
???lbl_noEntry???
???ViewItemFull_lblFileLicense???:
???lbl_noEntry???

???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderLocators???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???

???ViewItemFull_lblCreators???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblCreators???:
Krause, A.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Pugh, T. A. M.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Bayer, A. D.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Doelman, J. C.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Humpenöder, Florian2, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???                 
Anthoni, P.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Olin, S.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon2, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???                 
Popp, Alexander2, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???                 
Stehfest, E.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
Arneth, A.1, ???ENUM_CREATORROLE_AUTHOR???
???ViewItemFull_lblAffiliations???:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

???EditItem_lblContent???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblSubject???: ???lbl_noEntry???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblAbstract???: Land management for carbon storage is discussed as being indispensable for climate change mitigation because of its large potential to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and to avoid further emissions from deforestation. However, the acceptance and feasibility of land-based mitigation projects depends on potential side effects on other important ecosystem functions and their services. Here, we use projections of future land use and land cover for different land-based mitigation options from two land-use models (IMAGE and MAgPIE) and evaluate their effects with a global dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS). In the land-use models, carbon removal was achieved either via growth of bioenergy crops combined with carbon capture and storage, via avoided deforestation and afforestation, or via a combination of both. We compare these scenarios to a reference scenario without land-based mitigation and analyse the LPJ-GUESS simulations with the aim of assessing synergies and trade-offs across a range of ecosystem service indicators: carbon storage, surface albedo, evapotranspiration, water runoff, crop production, nitrogen loss, and emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds.

???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderDetails???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblLanguages???:
 ???ViewItemFull_lblDates???: 2017
 ???ViewItemFull_lblPublicationStatus???: ???ViewItem_lblPublicationState_published-in-print???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblPages???: ???lbl_noEntry???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblPublishingInfo???: ???lbl_noEntry???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblTOC???: ???lbl_noEntry???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblRevisionMethod???: ???ENUM_REVIEWMETHOD_PEER???
 ???ViewItemFull_lblIdentifiers???: ???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_DOI???: 10.5194/bg-14-4829-2017
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_PIKDOMAIN???: Climate Impacts & Vulnerabilities - Research Domain II
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_PIKDOMAIN???: Sustainable Solutions - Research Domain III
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_EDOC???: 7841
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_RESEARCHTK???: CO2 Removal
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_RESEARCHTK???: Ecosystems
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_RESEARCHTK???: Food & Agriculture
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_RESEARCHTK???: Land use
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_RESEARCHTK???: Mitigation
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_MODELMETHOD???: Model Intercomparison
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_MODELMETHOD???: MAgPIE
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_REGIONALK???: Global
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_ORGANISATIONALK???: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_ORGANISATIONALK???: RD2 - Climate Resilience
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_WORKINGGROUP???: Land Use and Resilience
???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_WORKINGGROUP???: Land-Use Management
 ???ViewItemFull_lblDegreeType???: ???lbl_noEntry???

???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderEvent???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???

???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderLegalCase???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???

???g_project_info???

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???

???ViewItemFull_lblSubHeaderSource??? 1

???ViewItemFull_lblShowGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblHideGroup???
???ViewItemFull_lblSourceTitle???: Biogeosciences
???ViewItemFull_lblSourceGenre???: ???ENUM_GENRE_JOURNAL???, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 ???ViewItemFull_lblSourceCreators???:
???ViewItemFull_lblSourceAffiliations???:
???ViewItemFull_lblSourcePubInfo???: ???lbl_noEntry???
???ViewItemFull_lblPages???: ???lbl_noEntry??? ???ViewItemFull_lblSourceVolumeIssue???: 14 (21) ???ViewItemFull_lblSourceSequenceNo???: ???lbl_noEntry??? ???ViewItemFull_lblSourceStartEndPage???: 4829 - 4850 ???ViewItemFull_lblSourceIdentifier???: ???ENUM_IDENTIFIERTYPE_CONE???: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals47