Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
 DetailsÜbersicht
  When standards have better distributional consequences than carbon taxes

Zhao, J., Mattauch, L. (in press): When standards have better distributional consequences than carbon taxes. - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_27431 Versions-Permalink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_27431_1
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Standards_v9.0.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 3MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
Standards_v9.0.pdf
Beschreibung:
akzeptierte Fassung
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Zhao, Jiaxin1, Autor
Mattauch, Linus2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Carbon pricing is the efficient instrument to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Nevertheless, the geographical and sectoral coverage of substantial carbon pricing
remains low, often due to concerns about increasing economic inequality. Regula-
tions such as fuel economy standards are more popular. Could the reason be that
they have an equity advantage over carbon pricing? We develop two models, one
representing energy services and the other the carbon-intensity of consumption, to
identify the economic situations in which this is the case. First, we prove that an ef-
ficiency standard can be more equitable than carbon pricing when consumers prefer
high-carbon technology attributes. Evidence from the US vehicle market confirms
this finding. Second, we show theoretically, and through a numerical application
to the Chinese transport sector, that intensity standards are preferable when richer
households consume a greater share of high-emissions goods. Our results hold when
the redistribution of carbon pricing revenue is not progressive. These insights may
help advance decarbonisation when pricing instruments remain unpopular.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2022-10-04
 Publikationsstatus: Angenommen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: MDB-ID: No data to archive
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Inequality, Human Well-Being and Development
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Economics
Research topic keyword: Inequality and Equity
Regional keyword: Global
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journal-of-environmental-economics-and-management
Publisher: Elsevier