English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget: A multi-model assessment

Abrell, J., Bilici, S., Blesl, M., Fahl, U., Kattelmann, F., Kittel, L., Kosch, M., Luderer, G., Marmullaku, D., Pahle, M., Pietzcker, R. C., Rodrigues, R., Siegle, J. (2024): Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget: A multi-model assessment. - Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101271

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
1-s2.0-S2211467X23002213-main.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
1-s2.0-S2211467X23002213-main.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Abrell, Jan1, Author
Bilici, Süheyb1, Author
Blesl, Markus1, Author
Fahl, Ulrich1, Author
Kattelmann, Felix1, Author
Kittel, Lena1, Author
Kosch, Mirjam2, Author              
Luderer, Gunnar2, Author              
Marmullaku, Drin1, Author
Pahle, Michael2, Author              
Pietzcker, Robert C.2, Author              
Rodrigues, Renato2, Author              
Siegle, Jonathan1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) moves atmospheric carbon to geological or land-based sinks. In a first-best setting, the optimal use of CDR is achieved by a removal subsidy that equals the optimal carbon tax and marginal damages. We derive second-best policy rules for CDR subsidies and carbon taxes when no global carbon price exists but a national government implements a unilateral climate policy. We find that the optimal carbon tax differs from an optimal CDR subsidy because of carbon leakage and a balance of resource trade effect. First, the optimal removal subsidy tends to be larger than the carbon tax because of lower supply-side leakage on fossil resource markets. Second, net carbon exporters exacerbate this wedge to increase producer surplus of their carbon resource producers, implying even larger removal subsidies. Third, net carbon importers may set their removal subsidy even below their carbon tax when marginal environmental damages are small, to appropriate producer surplus from carbon exporters.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-06-292023-12-012023-12-112024-01-01
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 7
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101271
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Working Group: Climate & Energy Policy
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Model / method: Model Intercomparison
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
Model / method: REMIND
Regional keyword: Europe
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Carbon Pricing
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Research topic keyword: Decarbonization
Research topic keyword: Economics
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show hide
Project name : ARIADNE
Grant ID : 03SFK5A
Funding program : -
Funding organization : -

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Energy Strategy Reviews
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 51 Sequence Number: 101271 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/energy-strategy-reviews
Publisher: Elsevier