Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  A review of climate security risk assessment tools

Sedova, B., Binder, L., Michelini, S., Schellens, M., Rüttinger, L. (2024): A review of climate security risk assessment tools. - Environment and Security, 2, 1, 175-210.
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796241226996

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Sedova, Barbora1, Autor              
Binder, Lisa1, Autor              
Michelini, Sidney1, Autor              
Schellens, Marie2, Autor
Rüttinger, Lukas2, Autor
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: To address climatic risks to human security, various climate security risk assessment (CSRA) tools have been developed. We have systematically reviewed 28 such tools against state-of-the-art research to (i) define best practices in CSRAs, (ii) identify related gaps in these tools and derive recommendations on how to address them, and (iii) outline a policy-relevant research agenda. We suggest the following measures to improve CSRA tools: Global South actors need to be more strongly involved in priority setting, conceptualization, risk analysis, and intervention design. CSRA tools should offer geographically disaggregated analyses, transparently explain choices regarding tools’ temporal and geographical foci, and assess their implications for the evidence. In this regard, any type of sampling bias should be avoided. Mixed methods can offer clear advantages to study the context-specific climate security dynamics across different time scales. The main gaps in the tools’ conceptualizations evolve around comprehensive consideration of risk determinants (climatic hazards, exposure, and vulnerability) and complex climate–security linkages, communication of uncertainty, and implementation of validation routines. These factors need to be better accounted for. To advance CSRAs, future research should, for example, develop methodologies to systematically integrate quantitative and qualitative approaches, improve the performance of risk predictions, and develop conflict projections.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2024-02-152024-03-01
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1177/27538796241226996
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Security, Ethnic Conflicts and Migration
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Model / method: Model Intercomparison
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: Climate impacts
Research topic keyword: Security & Migration
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Environment and Security
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, other
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 2 (1) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 175 - 210 Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/2753-8796
Publisher: Sage Publications