Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Exploring Site‐Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO2yr−1 Removal Challenge for Germany

Yao, W., Morganti, T. M., Wu, J., Borchers, M., Anschütz, A., Bednarz, L., Bhaumik, A., Böttcher, M., Burkhard, K., Cabus, T., Chua, A. S., Diercks, I., Esposito, M., Fink, M., Fouqueray, M., Gasanzade, F., Geilert, S., Hauck, J., Havermann, F., Hellige, I., Hoog, S., Jürchott, M., Kalapurakkal, H. T., Kemper, J., Kremin, I., Lange, I., Lencina‐Avila, J. M., Liadova, M., Liu, F., Mathesius, S., Mehendale, N., Nagwekar, T., Philippi, M., Luz, G. L. N., Ramasamy, M., Stahl, F., Tank, L., Vorrath, M., Westmark, L., Wey, H., Wollnik, R., Wölfelschneider, M., Bach, W., Bischof, K., Boersma, M., Daewel, U., Fernández‐Méndez, M., Geuer, J. K., Keller, D. P., Kopf, A., Merk, C., Moosdorf, N., Oppelt, N., Oschlies, A., Pongratz, J., Proelss, A., Rehder, G. J., Rüpke, L., Szarka, N., Thraen, D., Wallmann, K., Mengis, N. (2025): Exploring Site‐Specific Carbon Dioxide Removal Options With Storage or Sequestration in the Marine Environment – The 10 Mt CO2yr−1 Removal Challenge for Germany. - Earth's Future, 13, 4, e2024EF004902.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004902

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
32919oa.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
32919oa.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Yao, W.1, Autor
Morganti, T. M.1, Autor
Wu, J.1, Autor
Borchers, M.1, Autor
Anschütz, A.1, Autor
Bednarz, L.‐K.1, Autor
Bhaumik, A.1, Autor
Böttcher, M.1, Autor
Burkhard, K.1, Autor
Cabus, T.1, Autor
Chua, A. S.1, Autor
Diercks, I.1, Autor
Esposito, M.1, Autor
Fink, M.1, Autor
Fouqueray, M.1, Autor
Gasanzade, F.1, Autor
Geilert, S.1, Autor
Hauck, J.1, Autor
Havermann, F.1, Autor
Hellige, I.1, Autor
Hoog, S.1, AutorJürchott, M.1, AutorKalapurakkal, H. T.1, AutorKemper, J.1, AutorKremin, I.1, AutorLange, I.1, AutorLencina‐Avila, J. M.1, AutorLiadova, M.1, AutorLiu, F.1, AutorMathesius, Sabine2, Autor                 Mehendale, N.1, AutorNagwekar, T.1, AutorPhilippi, M.1, AutorLuz, G. L. N.1, AutorRamasamy, M.1, AutorStahl, F.1, AutorTank, L.1, AutorVorrath, M.‐E.1, AutorWestmark, L.1, AutorWey, H.‐W.1, AutorWollnik, R.1, AutorWölfelschneider, M.1, AutorBach, W.1, AutorBischof, K.1, AutorBoersma, M.1, AutorDaewel, U.1, AutorFernández‐Méndez, M.1, AutorGeuer, J. K.1, AutorKeller, D. P.1, AutorKopf, A.1, AutorMerk, C.1, AutorMoosdorf, N.1, AutorOppelt, N.1, AutorOschlies, A.1, AutorPongratz, J.1, AutorProelss, A.1, AutorRehder, G. J.1, AutorRüpke, L.1, AutorSzarka, N.1, AutorThraen, D.1, AutorWallmann, K.1, AutorMengis, N.1, Autor mehr..
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) and geological carbon storage in the marine environment (mCS) promise to help mitigate global climate change alongside drastic emission reductions. However, the implementable potential of mCDR and mCS depends, apart from technology readiness, also on site-specific conditions. In this work, we explore different options for mCDR and mCS, using the German context as a case study. We challenge each option to remove 10 Mt CO2 yr−1, accounting for 8%–22% of projected hard-to-abate and residual emissions of Germany in 2045. We focus on the environmental, resource, and infrastructure requirements of individual mCDR and mCS options at specific sites, within the German jurisdiction when possible. This serves as an entry point to discuss main uncertainty factors and research needs beyond technology readiness, and, where possible, cost estimates, expected environmental effects, and monitoring approaches. In total, we describe 10 mCDR and mCS options; four aim at enhancing the chemical carbon uptake of the ocean through alkalinity enhancement, four aim at enhancing blue carbon ecosystems' sink capacity, and two employ geological off-shore storage. Our results indicate that five out of 10 options would potentially be implementable within German jurisdiction, and three of them could potentially meet the challenge. Our exercise serves as an example on how the creation of more tangible and site-specific CDR options can provide a basis for the assessment of socio-economic, ethical, political, and legal aspects for such implementations. The approach presented here can easily be applied to other regional or national CDR capacity considerations.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2025-04-142025-04-14
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 32
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1029/2024EF004902
PIKDOMAIN: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
Organisational keyword: RD1 - Earth System Analysis
Working Group: Earth System Dynamics
MDB-ID: No data to archive
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Earth's Future
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 13 (4) Artikelnummer: e2024EF004902 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/170925
Publisher: Wiley