English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Existing gaps in understanding Sustainable Development Goals interactions: Insights from a systematic review

Khot, U. A., Warchold, A., Pradhan, P. (2025 online): Existing gaps in understanding Sustainable Development Goals interactions: Insights from a systematic review. - Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 118, 108274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108274

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
1-s2.0-S0195925525004718-main.pdf (Publisher version), 5MB
Name:
1-s2.0-S0195925525004718-main.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Khot, Utkarsh Ashok1, Author
Warchold, Anne1, Author
Pradhan, Prajal2, Author                 
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Most countries remain off track to fulfil the 2030 Agenda's 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets. One key challenge to achieving the 2030 Agenda lies in trade-offs arising from cherry-picking goals or targets at the expense of others. Overlooking these SDG interactions, i.e., synergies and trade-offs, risks creating conflicting policies that undermine the interconnected nature of sustainable development. Hence, there is a need to comprehensively understand how the interactions are being addressed in the growing body of literature. This study provides a systematic review of 272 articles selected from an initial search of 1818. The review reveals that interactions between targets within individual goals and occurring across different geographic boundaries are understudied. The fragmented representation of geographic scales in existing studies highlights another gap, emphasizing the need to understand local SDG interactions. Further, SDG interaction studies infrequently focus on low-income countries, revealing a geographic bias. Notably, an imbalance persists in SDG coverage, with SDGs requiring complex social, institutional, or political engagement (e.g., SDGs 5, 10, 16, and 17) remaining underrepresented in the literature. Most interaction studies focus on goal level rather than more granular target or indicator level analysis. By observing the trends and co-occurrence of methods used for interaction analysis, this study highlights the dominance of qualitative text-based and stakeholder-inclusive methods and a need to develop new approaches to analyze the interactions underlying causal mechanisms. By identifying key gaps and trends, this review can be leveraged to advance the research landscape, guiding the prioritization of SDGs.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2025-06-222025-11-102025-12-02
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 14
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108274
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Organisational keyword: Lab - Land Use Transition
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Research topic keyword: Sustainable Development
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
OATYPE: Hybrid Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Source Genre: Journal, SSCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 118 Sequence Number: 108274 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/1873-6432
Publisher: Elsevier