Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Ecosystem (dis)services matter for conservation policies: Insights from Nepal

Subedi, D. R., Liu, Q., Bhuju, D. R., Pradhan, P. (2025): Ecosystem (dis)services matter for conservation policies: Insights from Nepal. - Earth System Governance, 26, 100303.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100303

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
1-s2.0-S2589811625000692-main.pdf (Verlagsversion), 5MB
Name:
1-s2.0-S2589811625000692-main.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Subedi, Daya Raj1, Autor
Liu, Qijing1, Autor
Bhuju, Dinesh Raj1, Autor
Pradhan, Prajal2, Autor                 
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Ecosystem services have gained increasing policy relevance for their dual role in promoting biodiversity conservation and supporting human well-being. However, the integration of ecosystem services into conservation policies remains poorly understood. We examined how ecosystem services and disservices are incorporated into protected area policies in Nepal. A review of 111 laws and policies, supplemented by 19 expert interviews, was conducted. Our findings indicate gradual progress in integrating ecosystem services, both explicitly and implicitly, into conservation policies, with supporting and cultural services most frequently emphasized. In contrast, ecosystem disservices received minimal explicit recognition. Additionally, conservation policies increasingly align with corporate interests, often prioritizing commercial conservation initiatives over local community needs. Our Nepal case provides broader lessons for conservation policy and practice. Mainly, we highlight that ecosystem (dis)service integration is more robust when anchored in legally binding instruments, guided by pluralistic valuation approaches, and structured to protect indigenous and local communities.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2025-05-082025-11-222025-11-262025-12-01
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 12
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100303
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Organisational keyword: Lab - Land Use Transition
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Research topic keyword: Ecosystems
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Regional keyword: Asia
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Earth System Governance
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 26 Artikelnummer: 100303 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/2589-8116
Publisher: Elsevier