English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  (Un-)scientifically Spun: Narratives, Belief Updating, and Pro-Environmental Behavior

Banerjee, A., Momsen, K. (2025): (Un-)scientifically Spun: Narratives, Belief Updating, and Pro-Environmental Behavior. - Environmental and Resource Economics, 88, 3873-3903.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01045-2

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
s10640-025-01045-2-1.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
s10640-025-01045-2-1.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Banerjee, Anwesha1, 2, Author           
Momsen, Katharina3, Author
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_29970              
3External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Narratives Belief updating Pro-environmental behavior Environmental attitude Artificial intelligence
 Abstract: In an experiment conducted with 2346 US residents, we examine the effect of content (positive/ negative/ inconclusive) and style (scientific/unscientific) of narratives about CO2 emissions on belief updating and pro-environmental behavior. We use the Work for Environmental Protection Task (WEPT) by Lange and Dewitte (Behave Res Methods 54:133–145, 2022) as a proxy for pro-environmental behavior. Narratives are constructed using the natural language processing chatbot ChatGPT. We find that negative narratives significantly increase concern regarding CO2 emissions, while positive narratives significantly decrease concern, with the latter effect being significantly larger in terms of absolute value. For inconclusive narratives, the effect on beliefs depends on prior beliefs: Subjects with low prior beliefs increase their concern, whereas subjects with high prior beliefs decrease their concern. Moreover, we find that the unscientific style has a stronger
effect on belief updating than the scientific style. Neither content nor style affects pro-environmental behavior significantly.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2025-09-232025-01-202025-10-032025-11-182025-12-01
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 31
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s10640-025-01045-2
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
PIKDOMAIN: FutureLab - Ceres
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Ceres
Working Group: Governance
Research topic keyword: Economics
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Regional keyword: North America
Model / method: Econometrics
MDB-ID: pending
OATYPE: Hybrid - DEAL Springer Nature
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental and Resource Economics
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 88 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 3873 - 3903 Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/environmental-resource-economics
Publisher: Springer