English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Consensus or cheap talk? The discursive politics of South Africa’s just energy transition

Bez, C. S., Klug, T. W., Raederscheidt, G., Steckel, J. C. (2026 online): Consensus or cheap talk? The discursive politics of South Africa’s just energy transition. - Environmental Politics.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2670828

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Consensus or cheap talk The discursive politics of South Africa s just energy transition.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
Consensus or cheap talk The discursive politics of South Africa s just energy transition.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bez, Charlotte Sophia1, Author                 
Klug, Thomas W.1, Author                 
Raederscheidt, Giacomo2, Author
Steckel, Jan Christoph1, Author                 
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Just transitions; news media; South Africa; text as data; discursive politics; pre-decisional policy arena
 Abstract: The just transition concept has been hypothesised to serve as a unifying framework for designing socially accepted fossil fuel phaseout policies. Whether the concept actually moves actors towards political consensus remains contested. Using South Africa as an example and leveraging text-as-data approaches, we map public debate of just transitions and examine whether introduction of the Just Transition Framework and Just Energy Transition Partnership re-orients or reinforces existing actor positions. We analyse nearly 2,300 South African news articles published between 2008 and 2023. We then deconstruct just transition narratives, which are classified into three distinct political stances: skeptics, realists, and opportunists. We find that while just transition policies foster a common commitment to climate and social concerns, they do not resolve underlying political tensions. More generally, our analysis demonstrates how observable changes in discursive shifts can indicate feasibility conditions within policy formulation stages.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2025-08-212026-05-032026-05-21
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 26
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2026.2670828
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
PIKDOMAIN: FutureLab - Ceres
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Ceres
Working Group: Political Economy
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Research topic keyword: Political Economy
Regional keyword: Africa
OATYPE: Hybrid - Taylor & Francis
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show hide
Project name : CERES
Grant ID : -
Funding program : -
Funding organization : Werner Siemens Foundation

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Politics
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/environmental-politics
Publisher: Taylor & Francis