Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Consensus or cheap talk? The discursive politics of South Africa’s just energy transition

Bez, C. S., Klug, T. W., Raederscheidt, G., Steckel, J. C. (2026 online): Consensus or cheap talk? The discursive politics of South Africa’s just energy transition. - Environmental Politics.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2670828

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Consensus or cheap talk The discursive politics of South Africa s just energy transition.pdf (Verlagsversion), 4MB
Name:
Consensus or cheap talk The discursive politics of South Africa s just energy transition.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bez, Charlotte Sophia1, Autor                 
Klug, Thomas W.1, Autor                 
Raederscheidt, Giacomo2, Autor
Steckel, Jan Christoph1, Autor                 
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Just transitions; news media; South Africa; text as data; discursive politics; pre-decisional policy arena
 Zusammenfassung: The just transition concept has been hypothesised to serve as a unifying framework for designing socially accepted fossil fuel phaseout policies. Whether the concept actually moves actors towards political consensus remains contested. Using South Africa as an example and leveraging text-as-data approaches, we map public debate of just transitions and examine whether introduction of the Just Transition Framework and Just Energy Transition Partnership re-orients or reinforces existing actor positions. We analyse nearly 2,300 South African news articles published between 2008 and 2023. We then deconstruct just transition narratives, which are classified into three distinct political stances: skeptics, realists, and opportunists. We find that while just transition policies foster a common commitment to climate and social concerns, they do not resolve underlying political tensions. More generally, our analysis demonstrates how observable changes in discursive shifts can indicate feasibility conditions within policy formulation stages.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2025-08-212026-05-032026-05-21
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 26
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2026.2670828
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
PIKDOMAIN: FutureLab - Ceres
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Ceres
Working Group: Political Economy
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Research topic keyword: Political Economy
Regional keyword: Africa
OATYPE: Hybrid - Taylor & Francis
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden: ausblenden:
Projektname : CERES
Grant ID : -
Förderprogramm : -
Förderorganisation : Werner Siemens Foundation

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Environmental Politics
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/environmental-politics
Publisher: Taylor & Francis