English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals

Authors

Rogelj,  J.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Cooperation Partners;

Reisinger,  A.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Cooperation Partners;

McCollum,  D. L.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Cooperation Partners;

Knutti,  R.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Cooperation Partners;

Riahi,  K.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Cooperation Partners;

/persons/resource/meinshausen

Meinshausen,  Malte
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

7139.pdf
(Publisher version), 888KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Rogelj, J., Reisinger, A., McCollum, D. L., Knutti, R., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M. (2015): Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals. - Environmental Research Letters, 10, 7, 75003.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_20817
Abstract
Global-mean temperature increase is roughly proportional to cumulative emissions of carbon-dioxide (CO2). Limiting global warming to any level thus implies a finite CO2 budget. Due to geophysical uncertainties, the size of such budgets can only be expressed in probabilistic terms and is further influenced by non-CO2 emissions. We here explore how societal choices related to energy demand and specific mitigation options influence the size of carbon budgets for meeting a given temperature objective. We find that choices that exclude specific CO2 mitigation technologies (like Carbon Capture and Storage) result in greater costs, smaller compatible CO2 budgets until 2050, but larger CO2 budgets until 2100. Vice versa, choices that lead to a larger CO2 mitigation potential result in CO2 budgets until 2100 that are smaller but can be met at lower costs. In most cases, these budget variations can be explained by the amount of non-CO2 mitigation that is carried out in conjunction with CO2, and associated global carbon prices that also drive mitigation of non-CO2 gases. Budget variations are of the order of 10% around their central value. In all cases, limiting warming to below 2 °C thus still implies that CO2 emissions need to be reduced rapidly in the coming decades.