Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Assessing uncertainties in land cover projections

Urheber*innen

Alexander,  P.
External Organizations;

Prestele,  R.
External Organizations;

Verburg,  P. H.
External Organizations;

Arneth,  A.
External Organizations;

Baranzelli,  C.
External Organizations;

Batista e Silva,  F.
External Organizations;

Brown,  C.
External Organizations;

Butler,  A.
External Organizations;

Calvin,  K.
External Organizations;

Dendoncker,  N.
External Organizations;

Doelman,  J. C.
External Organizations;

Dunford,  R.
External Organizations;

Engström,  K.
External Organizations;

Eitelberg,  D.
External Organizations;

Fujimori,  S.
External Organizations;

Harrison,  P. A.
External Organizations;

Hasegawa,  T.
External Organizations;

Havlik,  P.
External Organizations;

Holzhauer,  S.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Florian.Humpenoeder

Humpenöder,  Florian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Jacobs-Crisioni,  C.
External Organizations;

Jain,  A. K.
External Organizations;

Krisztin,  T.
External Organizations;

Kyle,  P.
External Organizations;

Lavalle,  C.
External Organizations;

Lenton,  T.
External Organizations;

Liu,  J.
External Organizations;

Meiyappan,  P.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Alexander.Popp

Popp,  Alexander
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Powell,  T.
External Organizations;

Sands,  R. D.
External Organizations;

Schaldach,  R.
External Organizations;

Stehfest,  E.
External Organizations;

Steinbuks,  J.
External Organizations;

Tabeau,  A.
External Organizations;

Meijl,  H. van
External Organizations;

Wise,  M. A.
External Organizations;

Rounsevell,  M. D. A.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PIKpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Alexander, P., Prestele, R., Verburg, P. H., Arneth, A., Baranzelli, C., Batista e Silva, F., Brown, C., Butler, A., Calvin, K., Dendoncker, N., Doelman, J. C., Dunford, R., Engström, K., Eitelberg, D., Fujimori, S., Harrison, P. A., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Holzhauer, S., Humpenöder, F., Jacobs-Crisioni, C., Jain, A. K., Krisztin, T., Kyle, P., Lavalle, C., Lenton, T., Liu, J., Meiyappan, P., Popp, A., Powell, T., Sands, R. D., Schaldach, R., Stehfest, E., Steinbuks, J., Tabeau, A., Meijl, H. v., Wise, M. A., Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2017): Assessing uncertainties in land cover projections. - Global Change Biology, 23, 2, 767-781.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13447


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_21252
Zusammenfassung
Understanding uncertainties in land cover projections is critical to investigating land‐based climate mitigation policies, assessing the potential of climate adaptation strategies and quantifying the impacts of land cover change on the climate system. Here, we identify and quantify uncertainties in global and European land cover projections over a diverse range of model types and scenarios, extending the analysis beyond the agro‐economic models included in previous comparisons. The results from 75 simulations over 18 models are analysed and show a large range in land cover area projections, with the highest variability occurring in future cropland areas. We demonstrate systematic differences in land cover areas associated with the characteristics of the modelling approach, which is at least as great as the differences attributed to the scenario variations. The results lead us to conclude that a higher degree of uncertainty exists in land use projections than currently included in climate or earth system projections. To account for land use uncertainty, it is recommended to use a diverse set of models and approaches when assessing the potential impacts of land cover change on future climate. Additionally, further work is needed to better understand the assumptions driving land use model results and reveal the causes of uncertainty in more depth, to help reduce model uncertainty and improve the projections of land cover.