Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions


Grosjean,  Godefroy
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Fuss,  S.
External Organizations;

Koch,  N.
External Organizations;


Bodirsky,  Benjamin Leon
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

De Cara,  S.
External Organizations;

Acworth,  W.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Grosjean, G., Fuss, S., Koch, N., Bodirsky, B. L., De Cara, S., Acworth, W. (2018): Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions. - Climate Policy, 18, 2, 151-169.

Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_21352
Although agriculture could contribute substantially to European emission reductions, its mitigation potential lies untapped and dormant. Market-based instruments could be pivotal in incentivizing cost-effective abatement. However, sector specificities in transaction costs, leakage risks and distributional impacts impede its implementation. The significance of such barriers critically hinges on the dimensions of policy design. This article synthesizes the work on emissions pricing in agriculture together with the literature on the design of market-based instruments. To structure the discussion, an options space is suggested to map policy options, focusing on three key dimensions of policy design. More specifically, it examines the role of policy coverage, instruments and transfers to farmers in overcoming the barriers. First, the results show that a significant proportion of agricultural emissions and mitigation potential could be covered by a policy targeting large farms and few emission sources, thereby reducing transaction costs. Second, whether an instrument is voluntary or mandatory influences distributional outcomes and leakage. Voluntary instruments can mitigate distributional concerns and leakage risks but can lead to subsidy lock-in and carbon price distortion. Third, the impact on transfers resulting from the interaction of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) with emissions pricing will play a key role in shaping political feasibility and has so far been underappreciated.