Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: a review

Urheber*innen

Dieperink,  C.
External Organizations;

Hegger,  D. L. T.
External Organizations;

Bakker,  M. H. N.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/zbyszek

Kundzewicz,  Zbigniew W.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Green,  C.
External Organizations;

Driessen,  P. P. J.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

7509.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 416KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Dieperink, C., Hegger, D. L. T., Bakker, M. H. N., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Green, C., Driessen, P. P. J. (2016): Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: a review. - Water Resources Management, 30, 13, 4467-4481.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_21486
Zusammenfassung
In Europe increasing flood risks challenge societies to diversify their Flood Risk Management Strategies (FRMSs). Such a diversification implies that actors not only focus on flood defence, but also and simultaneously on flood risk prevention, mitigation, preparation and recovery. There is much literature on the implementation of specific strategies and measures as well as on flood risk governance more generally. What is lacking, though, is a clear overview of the complex set of governance challenges which may result from a diversification and alignment of FRM strategies. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap. It elaborates on potential processes and mechanisms for coordinating the activities and capacities of actors that are involved on different levels and in different sectors of flood risk governance, both concerning the implementation of individual strategies and the coordination of the overall set of strategies. It identifies eight overall coordination mechanisms that have proven to be useful in this respect.