English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands

Authors

Sándor,  R.
External Organizations;

Ehrhardt,  F.
External Organizations;

Brilli,  L.
External Organizations;

Carozzi,  M.
External Organizations;

Recous,  S.
External Organizations;

Smith,  P.
External Organizations;

Snow,  V.
External Organizations;

Soussana,  J.-F.
External Organizations;

Dorich,  C. D.
External Organizations;

Fuchs,  K.
External Organizations;

Fitton,  N.
External Organizations;

Gongadze,  K.
External Organizations;

Klumpp,  K.
External Organizations;

Liebig,  M.
External Organizations;

Martin,  R.
External Organizations;

Merbold,  L.
External Organizations;

Newton,  P. C. D.
External Organizations;

Rees,  R. M.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Rolinski

Rolinski,  Susanne
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Bellocchi,  G.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Sándor, R., Ehrhardt, F., Brilli, L., Carozzi, M., Recous, S., Smith, P., Snow, V., Soussana, J.-F., Dorich, C. D., Fuchs, K., Fitton, N., Gongadze, K., Klumpp, K., Liebig, M., Martin, R., Merbold, L., Newton, P. C. D., Rees, R. M., Rolinski, S., Bellocchi, G. (2018): The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands. - Science of the Total Environment, 642, 292-306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.020


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22586
Abstract
Simulation models quantify the impacts on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grassland systems caused by changes in management practices. To support agricultural policies, it is however important to contrast the responses of alternative models, which can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and in their response to management. We applied eight biogeochemical models at five grassland sites (in France, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States) to compare the sensitivity of modelled C and N fluxes to changes in the density of grazing animals (from 100% to 50% of the original livestock densities), also in combination with decreasing N fertilization levels (reduced to zero from the initial levels). Simulated multi-model median values indicated that input reduction would lead to an increase in the C sink strength (negative net ecosystem C exchange) in intensive grazing systems: −64 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (animal density reduction) and −81 ± 74 g C m−2 yr−1 (N and animal density reduction), against the baseline of −30.5 ± 69.5 g C m−2 yr−1 (LSU [livestock units] ≥ 0.76 ha−1 yr−1). Simulations also indicated a strong effect of N fertilizer reduction on N fluxes, e.g. N2O-N emissions decreased from 0.34 ± 0.22 (baseline) to 0.1 ± 0.05 g N m−2 yr−1 (no N fertilization). Simulated decline in grazing intensity had only limited impact on the N balance. The simulated pattern of enteric methane emissions was dominated by high model-to-model variability. The reduction in simulated offtake (animal intake + cut biomass) led to a doubling in net primary production per animal (increased by 11.6 ± 8.1 t C LSU−1 yr−1 across sites). The highest N2O-N intensities (N2O-N/offtake) were simulated at mown and extensively grazed arid sites. We show the possibility of using grassland models to determine sound mitigation practices while quantifying the uncertainties associated with the simulated outputs.