English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Coupling land-use change and hydrologic models for quantification of catchment ecosystem services

Authors

Yalew,  S. G.
External Organizations;

Pilz,  T.
External Organizations;

Schweitzer,  C.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Stefan.Liersch

Liersch,  Stefan
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Kwast,  J. van der
External Organizations;

Griensven,  A. van
External Organizations;

Mul,  M. L.
External Organizations;

Dickens,  C.
External Organizations;

Zaag,  P. van der
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Yalew, S. G., Pilz, T., Schweitzer, C., Liersch, S., Kwast, J. v. d., Griensven, A. v., Mul, M. L., Dickens, C., Zaag, P. v. d. (2018): Coupling land-use change and hydrologic models for quantification of catchment ecosystem services. - Environmental Modelling and Software, 109, 315-328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.029


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22608
Abstract
Representation of land-use and hydrologic interactions in respective models has traditionally been problematic. The use of static land-use in most hydrologic models or that of the use of simple hydrologic proxies in land-use change models call for more integrated approaches. The objective of this study is to assess whether dynamic feedback between land-use change and hydrology can (1) improve model performances, and/or (2) produce a more realistic quantification of ecosystem services. To test this, we coupled a land-use change model and a hydrologic mode. First, the land-use change and the hydrologic models were separately developed and calibrated. Then, the two models were dynamically coupled to exchange data at yearly time-steps. The approach is applied to a catchment in South Africa. Performance of coupled models when compared to the uncoupled models were marginal, but the coupled models excelled at the quantification of catchment ecosystem services more robustly.