Modelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy 
design: a comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model

Quijas, S.; Boit, A.; Thonicke, Kirsten; Murray-Tortarolo, G.; Mwampamba, T.; Skutsch, M.; Simoes, M.; Ascarrunz, N.; Pena-Claros, M.; Jones, L.; Arets, E.; Jaramillo, V. J.; Lazos, E.; Toledo, M.; Martorano, L. G.; Ferraz, R.; Balvanera, P.

doi:10.1080/26395908.2018.1542413

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Modelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy design: a comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model

Urheber*innen

Quijas, S.
External Organizations;

Boit, A.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Kirsten.Thonicke

Thonicke, Kirsten
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Murray-Tortarolo, G.
External Organizations;

Mwampamba, T.
External Organizations;

Skutsch, M.
External Organizations;

Simoes, M.
External Organizations;

Ascarrunz, N.
External Organizations;

Pena-Claros, M.
External Organizations;

Jones, L.
External Organizations;

Arets, E.
External Organizations;

Jaramillo, V. J.
External Organizations;

Lazos, E.
External Organizations;

Toledo, M.
External Organizations;

Martorano, L. G.
External Organizations;

Ferraz, R.
External Organizations;

Balvanera, P.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

8270oa.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 5MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Quijas, S., Boit, A., Thonicke, K., Murray-Tortarolo, G., Mwampamba, T., Skutsch, M., Simoes, M., Ascarrunz, N., Pena-Claros, M., Jones, L., Arets, E., Jaramillo, V. J., Lazos, E., Toledo, M., Martorano, L. G., Ferraz, R., Balvanera, P. (2018): Modelling carbon stock and carbon sequestration ecosystem services for policy design: a comprehensive approach using a dynamic vegetation model. - Ecosystems and People, 15, 1, 42-60.
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395908.2018.1542413

Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22758

Zusammenfassung

Ecosystem service (ES) models can only inform policy design adequately if they incorporate ecological processes. We used the Lund-Potsdam-Jena managed Land (LPJmL) model, to address following questions for Mexico, Bolivia and Brazilian Amazon: (i) How different are C stocks and C sequestration quantifications under standard (when soil and litter C and heterotrophic respiration are not considered) and comprehensive (including all C stock and heterotrophic respiration) approach? and (ii) How does the valuation of C stock and C sequestration differ in national payments for ES and global C funds or markets when comparing both approach? We found that up to 65% of C stocks have not been taken into account by neglecting to include C stored in soil and litter, resulting in gross underpayments (up to 500 times lower). Since emissions from heterotrophic respiration of organic material offset a large proportion of C gained through growth of living matter, we found that markets and decision-makers are inadvertently overestimating up to 100 times C sequestrated. New approaches for modelling C services relevant ecological process-based can help accounting for C in soil, litter and heterotrophic respiration and become important for the operationalization of agreements on climate change mitigation following the COP21 in 2015.