Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models

Urheber*innen

Krey,  V.
External Organizations;

Guo,  F.
External Organizations;

Kolp,  P.
External Organizations;

Zhou,  W.
External Organizations;

Schaeffer,  R.
External Organizations;

Awasthy,  A.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Bertram

Bertram,  Christoph
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Sytze de Boer,  H.
External Organizations;

Fragkos,  P.
External Organizations;

Fujimori,  S.
External Organizations;

He,  C.
External Organizations;

Iyer,  G.
External Organizations;

Keramidas,  K.
External Organizations;

Köberle,  A. C.
External Organizations;

Oshiro,  K.
External Organizations;

Reis,  L. A.
External Organizations;

Shoai-Tehrani,  B.
External Organizations;

Vishwanathan,  S.
External Organizations;

Capros,  P.
External Organizations;

Drouet,  L.
External Organizations;

Edmonds,  J. E.
External Organizations;

Garg,  A.
External Organizations;

Gernaat,  D. E. H. J.
External Organizations;

Jiang,  K.
External Organizations;

Kannavou,  M.
External Organizations;

Kitous,  A.
External Organizations;

Kriegler,  E.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Gunnar.Luderer

Luderer,  Gunnar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Mathur,  R.
External Organizations;

Muratori,  M.
External Organizations;

Sano,  F.
External Organizations;

Vuuren,  D. P. van
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

8368oa.pdf
(beliebiger Volltext), 4MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Krey, V., Guo, F., Kolp, P., Zhou, W., Schaeffer, R., Awasthy, A., Bertram, C., Sytze de Boer, H., Fragkos, P., Fujimori, S., He, C., Iyer, G., Keramidas, K., Köberle, A. C., Oshiro, K., Reis, L. A., Shoai-Tehrani, B., Vishwanathan, S., Capros, P., Drouet, L., Edmonds, J. E., Garg, A., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., Jiang, K., Kannavou, M., Kitous, A., Kriegler, E., Luderer, G., Mathur, R., Muratori, M., Sano, F., Vuuren, D. P. v. (2019): Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models. - Energy, 172, 1254-1267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.131


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22934
Zusammenfassung
Integrated assessment models are extensively used in the analysis of climate change mitigation and are informing national decision makers as well as contribute to international scientific assessments. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of techno-economic assumptions in the electricity sector among fifteen different global and national integrated assessment models. Particular focus is given to six major economies in the world: Brazil, China, the EU, India, Japan and the US. The comparison reveals that techno-economic characteristics are quite different across integrated assessment models, both for the base year and future years. It is, however, important to recognize that techno-economic assessments from the literature exhibit an equally large range of parameters as the integrated assessment models reviewed. Beyond numerical differences, the representation of technologies also differs among models, which needs to be taken into account when comparing numerical parameters. While desirable, it seems difficult to fully harmonize techno-economic parameters across a broader range of models due to structural differences in the representation of technology. Therefore, making techno-economic parameters available in the future, together with of the technology representation as well as the exact definitions of the parameters should become the standard approach as it allows an open discussion of appropriate assumptions.