English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries - A global comparative analysis

Authors

Dorband,  I. I.
External Organizations;

Jakob,  M.
External Organizations;

Kalkuhl,  M.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Jan.Steckel

Steckel,  Jan Christoph
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

8867oa.pdf
(Any fulltext), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dorband, I. I., Jakob, M., Kalkuhl, M., Steckel, J. C. (2019): Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low- and middle-income countries - A global comparative analysis. - World Development, 115, 246-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.015


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_23755
Abstract
Even though concerns about adverse distributional implications for the poor are one of the most important political challenges for carbon pricing, the existing literature reveals ambiguous results. For this reason, we assess the expected incidence of moderate carbon price increases for different income groups in 87 mostly low- and middle-income countries. Building on a consistent dataset and method, we find that for countries with per capita incomes of below USD 15,000 per year (at PPP-adjusted 2011 USD) carbon pricing has, on average, progressive distributional effects. We also develop a novel decomposition technique to show that distributional outcomes are primarily determined by differences among income groups in consumption patterns of energy, rather than of food, goods or services. We argue that an inverse U-shape relationship between energy expenditure shares and income explains why carbon pricing tends to be regressive in countries with relatively higher income. Since these countries are likely to have more financial resources and institutional capacities to deal with distributional issues, our findings suggest that mitigating climate change, raising domestic revenue and reducing economic inequality are not mutually exclusive, even in low- and middle-income countries.