English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework

Authors

O’Neill,  Brian C.
External Organizations;

Carter,  Timothy R.
External Organizations;

Ebi,  Kristie
External Organizations;

Harrison,  Paula A.
External Organizations;

Kemp-Benedict,  Eric
External Organizations;

Kok,  Kasper
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Elmar.Kriegler

Kriegler,  Elmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Preston,  Benjamin L.
External Organizations;

Riahi,  Keywan
External Organizations;

Sillmann,  Jana
External Organizations;

van Ruijven,  Bas J.
External Organizations;

van Vuuren,  Detlef
External Organizations;

Carlisle,  David
External Organizations;

Conde,  Cecilia
External Organizations;

Fuglestvedt,  Jan
External Organizations;

Green,  Carole
External Organizations;

Hasegawa,  Tomoko
External Organizations;

Leininger,  Julia
External Organizations;

Monteith,  Seth
External Organizations;

Pichs-Madruga,  Ramon
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

O’Neill, B. C., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K., Harrison, P. A., Kemp-Benedict, E., Kok, K., Kriegler, E., Preston, B. L., Riahi, K., Sillmann, J., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D., Carlisle, D., Conde, C., Fuglestvedt, J., Green, C., Hasegawa, T., Leininger, J., Monteith, S., Pichs-Madruga, R. (2020): Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. - Nature Climate Change, 10, 12, 1074-1084.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_24864
Abstract
Long-term global scenarios have underpinned research and assessment of global environmental change for four decades. Over the past ten years, the climate change research community has developed a scenario framework combining alternative futures of climate and society to facilitate integrated research and consistent assessment to inform policy. Here we assess how well this framework is working and what challenges it faces. We synthesize insights from scenario-based literature, community discussions and recent experience in assessments, concluding that the framework has been widely adopted across research communities and is largely meeting immediate needs. However, some mixed successes and a changing policy and research landscape present key challenges, and we recommend several new directions for the development and use of this framework.