English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being

Authors

Creutzig,  Felix
External Organizations;

Niamir,  Leila
External Organizations;

Bai,  Xuemei
External Organizations;

Callaghan,  Max
External Organizations;

Cullen,  Jonathan
External Organizations;

Díaz-José,  Julio
External Organizations;

Figueroa,  Maria
External Organizations;

Grubler,  Arnulf
External Organizations;

Lamb,  William F.
External Organizations;

Leip,  Adrian
External Organizations;

Masanet,  Eric
External Organizations;

Mata,  Érika
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Linus.Mattauch

Mattauch,  Linus
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Minx,  Jan C.
External Organizations;

Mirasgedis,  Sebastian
External Organizations;

Mulugetta,  Yacob
External Organizations;

Nugroho,  Sudarmanto Budi
External Organizations;

Pathak,  Minal
External Organizations;

Perkins,  Patricia
External Organizations;

Roy,  Joyashree
External Organizations;

de la Rue du Can,  Stephane
External Organizations;

Saheb,  Yamina
External Organizations;

Some,  Shreya
External Organizations;

Steg,  Linda
External Organizations;

Steinberger,  Julia
External Organizations;

Ürge-Vorsatz,  Diana
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Creutzig, F., Niamir, L., Bai, X., Callaghan, M., Cullen, J., Díaz-José, J., Figueroa, M., Grubler, A., Lamb, W. F., Leip, A., Masanet, E., Mata, É., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Mirasgedis, S., Mulugetta, Y., Nugroho, S. B., Pathak, M., Perkins, P., Roy, J., de la Rue du Can, S., Saheb, Y., Some, S., Steg, L., Steinberger, J., Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2022): Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being. - Nature Climate Change, 12, 1, 36-46.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_26285
Abstract
Mitigation solutions are often evaluated in terms of costs and greenhouse gas reduction potentials, missing out on the consideration of direct effects on human well-being. Here, we systematically assess the mitigation potential of demand-side options categorized into avoid, shift and improve, and their human well-being links. We show that these options, bridging socio-behavioural, infrastructural and technological domains, can reduce counterfactual sectoral emissions by 40–80% in end-use sectors. Based on expert judgement and an extensive literature database, we evaluate 306 combinations of well-being outcomes and demand-side options, finding largely beneficial effects in improvement in well-being (79% positive, 18% neutral and 3% negative), even though we find low confidence on the social dimensions of well-being. Implementing such nuanced solutions is based axiomatically on an understanding of malleable rather than fixed preferences, and procedurally on changing infrastructures and choice architectures. Results demonstrate the high mitigation potential of demand-side mitigation options that are synergistic with well-being.