Understanding regressivity: Challenges and opportunities of European carbon 
pricing

Feindt, Simon; Kornek, Ulrike; Labeaga, José M.; Sterner, Thomas; Ward, Hauke

doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105550

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Understanding regressivity: Challenges and opportunities of European carbon pricing

Authors

Feindt, Simon
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/kornek.ulrike

Kornek, Ulrike
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Labeaga, José M.
External Organizations;

Sterner, Thomas
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/hauke.ward

Ward, Hauke
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

26649oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 5MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Feindt, S., Kornek, U., Labeaga, J. M., Sterner, T., Ward, H. (2021): Understanding regressivity: Challenges and opportunities of European carbon pricing. - Energy Economics, 103, 105550.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105550

Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_26649

Abstract

We examine how a European carbon price will affect citizens by studying its incidence on households in 23 countries of the EU. At the national level, the distributional impact before revenue recycling is mainly neutral, sometimes progressive. At an aggregate EU level, however, the impact is regressive because some low-income countries would be strongly affected by the carbon price. While national redistribution can yield a progressive EU incidence, we show that European-wide redistribution is more effective for the most affected households. We offer two indicators to offset regressive distributional effects of EU climate policy, such as the recently proposed Green Deal. The first renders the tax burden proportional; the second focuses on compensating the households most severely affected. Including both indicators in European redistribution makes for a better representation of the initial burden of carbon pricing and could increase public acceptability.