English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Agricultural livelihoods, adaptation, and environmental migration in sub-Saharan drylands: a meta-analytical review

Authors
/persons/resource/Roman.Hoffmann

Hoffmann,  Roman
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Wiederkehr,  Charlotte
External Organizations;

Dimitrova,  Anna
External Organizations;

Hermans,  Kathleen
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

28060oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 3MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hoffmann, R., Wiederkehr, C., Dimitrova, A., Hermans, K. (2022): Agricultural livelihoods, adaptation, and environmental migration in sub-Saharan drylands: a meta-analytical review. - Environmental Research Letters, 17, 8, 083003.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7d65


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28060
Abstract
Drylands in sub-Saharan Africa are strongly affected by the impacts of climate change. Temperature increases, changes in rainfall patterns, and land degradation pose serious threats to food security, health, and water availability in the region. The increase in livelihood insecurity can in turn trigger migration as a way to adapt or cope with stress. Based on 89 original case studies, this study uses review and meta-analytical techniques to systematically explore the relationship between environmental change, adaptation, and migration in rural areas in sub-Saharan drylands. We show that households use a diverse range of strategies to respond to environmental hardships in different livelihood and ecological contexts. While migration is common in some communities, it is of less relevance to others, and it can take various forms. Our findings indicate that migration is often used as a complementary strategy to other forms of adaptation, which can vary depending on situational needs. We use cluster analysis to identify adaptation clusters and show how linked response strategies differ by socioeconomic conditions. We find that migration can serve as a last resort measure for highly vulnerable groups, or be used in combination with in-situ strategies for diversifying income and adapting agricultural practices. Our results have important implications highlighting the role of local conditions and complementary forms of coping and adaptation for understanding environmental migration.