English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Corrigendum: Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time (2023 Environ. Res. Lett.18 054015)

Authors
/persons/resource/Nicolas.Bauer

Bauer,  Nicolas
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Keller,  David P.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/julius.garbe

Garbe,  Julius
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Karstens

Karstens,  Kristine
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/franziska.piontek

Piontek,  Franziska
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Werner.von.Bloh

von Bloh,  Werner
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Thiery,  Wim
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/zeitz

Zeitz,  Maria
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/matthias.mengel

Mengel,  Matthias
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Jessica.Strefler

Strefler,  Jessica
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Kirsten.Thonicke

Thonicke,  Kirsten
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Ricarda.Winkelmann

Winkelmann,  Ricarda
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

pdf
(Publisher version), 496KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Bauer, N., Keller, D. P., Garbe, J., Karstens, K., Piontek, F., von Bloh, W., Thiery, W., Zeitz, M., Mengel, M., Strefler, J., Thonicke, K., Winkelmann, R. (2023): Corrigendum: Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time (2023 Environ. Res. Lett.18 054015). - Environmental Research Letters, 18, 8, 089501.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace270


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28833
Abstract
The original version of the table flipped the four cells for the two scenarios in the rows “Climate policy” and “Mitigation cost”. The corrected version in table 1 summarizes that the scenario with “Minimum Overshoot” requires higher “Carbon prices” and implies larger “Reduction in GDP from baseline” than the case with “Full Overshoot”. The original ver- sion reported the opposite.