日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Corrigendum: Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time (2023 Environ. Res. Lett.18 054015)

Authors
/persons/resource/Nicolas.Bauer

Bauer,  Nicolas
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Keller,  David P.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/julius.garbe

Garbe,  Julius
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Karstens

Karstens,  Kristine
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/franziska.piontek

Piontek,  Franziska
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Werner.von.Bloh

von Bloh,  Werner
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Thiery,  Wim
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/zeitz

Zeitz,  Maria
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/matthias.mengel

Mengel,  Matthias
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Jessica.Strefler

Strefler,  Jessica
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Kirsten.Thonicke

Thonicke,  Kirsten
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Ricarda.Winkelmann

Winkelmann,  Ricarda
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

URL
There are no locators available
フルテキスト (公開)

pdf
(出版社版), 496KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Bauer, N., Keller, D. P., Garbe, J., Karstens, K., Piontek, F., von Bloh, W., Thiery, W., Zeitz, M., Mengel, M., Strefler, J., Thonicke, K., & Winkelmann, R. (2023). Corrigendum: Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time (2023 Environ. Res. Lett.18 054015). Environmental Research Letters, 18(8):. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ace270.


引用: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28833
要旨
The original version of the table flipped the four cells for the two scenarios in the rows “Climate policy” and “Mitigation cost”. The corrected version in table 1 summarizes that the scenario with “Minimum Overshoot” requires higher “Carbon prices” and implies larger “Reduction in GDP from baseline” than the case with “Full Overshoot”. The original ver- sion reported the opposite.