English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Why investing in new nuclear plants is bad for the climate [Commentary]

Authors

Haywood,  Luke
External Organizations;

Leroutier,  Marion
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Robert.Pietzcker

Pietzcker,  Robert C.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Haywood, L., Leroutier, M., Pietzcker, R. C. (2023): Why investing in new nuclear plants is bad for the climate [Commentary]. - Joule, 7, 8, 1675-1678.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.006


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28842
Abstract
There has been a strong push to promote increased investments in new nuclear power as a strategy to decarbonize economies, especially in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). The evidence base for these initiatives is poor. Investments in new nuclear power plants are bad for the climate due to high costs and long construction times. Given the urgency of climate change mitigation, which requires reducing emissions from the EU electricity grid to almost zero in the 2030s (Pietzcker et al.1 ), preference should be given to the cheapest technology that can be deployed fastest. On both costs and speed, renewable energy sources beat nuclear. Every euro invested in new nuclear plants thus delays decarbonization compared to investments in renewable power. In a decarbonizing world, delays increase CO2 emissions.