Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONEN

Dieser Datensatz wurde verworfen!DetailsÜbersicht

Verworfen

Zeitschriftenartikel

Carbon emissions and economic impacts of an EU embargo on Russian fossil fuels

Urheber*innen

Liu, Li-Jing
External Organizations;

Jiang, Hong-Dian
External Organizations;

Liang, Qiao-Mei
External Organizations;

Creutzig, Felix
External Organizations;

Liao, Hua
External Organizations;

Yao, Yun-Fei
External Organizations;

Qian, Xiang-Yan
External Organizations;

Ren, Zhong-Yuan
External Organizations;

Qing, Jing
External Organizations;

Cai, Qi-Ran
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer, Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Wei, Yi-Ming
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PIKpublic verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Liu, L.-J., Jiang, H.-D., Liang, Q.-M., Creutzig, F., Liao, H., Yao, Y.-F., Qian, X.-Y., Ren, Z.-Y., Qing, J., Cai, Q.-R., Edenhofer, O., Wei, Y.-M. (2023): Carbon emissions and economic impacts of an EU embargo on Russian fossil fuels. - Nature Climate Change, 13, 290-296.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01606-7

Zusammenfassung

The Russia–Ukraine conflict lays bare the dependence of the European Union (EU) on fossil fuel imports from Russia. Here, we use a global computable general equilibrium model, C3IAM/GEEPA, to estimate CO2 emission and gross domestic product (GDP) impact of embargoing fossil fuels from Russia. We find that embargoes induce more than 10% reduction of CO2 emissions in the EU and over 5% increases of emissions in Russia, while both regions experience GDP losses (around 2% (US $486 billion) for the EU and about 5% (US $149 billion) for Russia, ignoring the relative impact of other sanctions). Reacting to increasing energy prices with demand-side response inside the EU would increase CO2 emission savings, and ease GDP losses; however, the world would continue to suffer economic damage (US $655 billion).