???ENUM_LANGUAGE_JA???
 
???mainMenu_lnkPrivacyPolicy??? ???mainMenu_lnkPolicy???

???ViewItemPage???


???ENUM_STATE_RELEASED???

???ENUM_GENRE_REPORT???

Selling CBAM: Diplomacy for the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

???ViewItemOverview_lblSpecificAuthorsSection???

Feist,  Marian
External Organizations;

Kühner,  Ann-Kathrin
External Organizations;

Flachsland,  Christian
External Organizations;

???ViewItemOverview_lblExternalResourceSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noExternalResourcesAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblRestrictedFulltextSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noRestrictedFullTextsAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblFulltextSection???

Ariadne-Analysis_CBAM-Diplomacy_June2024.pdf
(???ENUM_CONTENTCATEGORY_publisher-version???), 611???ViewItemMedium_lblFileSizeKB???

???ViewItemOverview_lblSupplementaryMaterialSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noSupplementaryMaterialAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblCitationSection???

Feist, M., Kühner, A.-K., Flachsland, C. (2024): Selling CBAM: Diplomacy for the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, (Ariadne-Analyse), Potsdam : Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 27 p.
https://doi.org/10.48485/pik.2024.010


???ViewItemOverview_lblCiteAs???: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_29993
???ViewItemOverview_lblAbstractSection???
The European Union’s outreach to third countries during the introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism was rigid and uncoordinated, new Ariadne analysis has found. Researchers investigated how the EU organized its diplomacy to counter trade concerns during the development of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. According to the Ariadne researchers, the fact that the EU’s diplomatic outreach was rather reactive may have helped to provide less of a target for opposition from trading partners and to increase acceptance of the mechanism as an expression of the EU’s claim to leadership in ambitious climate policy.