Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Zeitschriftenartikel

Regional uncertainty analysis between crop phenology model structures and optimal parameters

Urheber*innen

Yang,  Chenyao
External Organizations;

Lei,  Na
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Christoph.Menz

Menz,  Christoph
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Ceglar,  Andrej
External Organizations;

Torres-Matallana,  Jairo Arturo
External Organizations;

Li,  Siqi
External Organizations;

Jiang,  Yanling
External Organizations;

Tan,  Xianming
External Organizations;

Tao,  Lei
External Organizations;

He,  Fang
External Organizations;

Li,  Shigui
External Organizations;

Liu,  Bing
External Organizations;

Yang,  Feng
External Organizations;

Fraga,  Helder
External Organizations;

Santos,  João A.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Yang, C., Lei, N., Menz, C., Ceglar, A., Torres-Matallana, J. A., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Tan, X., Tao, L., He, F., Li, S., Liu, B., Yang, F., Fraga, H., Santos, J. A. (2024): Regional uncertainty analysis between crop phenology model structures and optimal parameters. - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 355, 110137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110137


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_30290
Zusammenfassung
Crop phenology models are pivotal for simulating crop development, predicting yields and guiding agricultural practices. However, uncertainties exist in simulations due to different model structures and variability in model parameters. Although quantifying these contributions to total variability is often conducted at a site-specific level, few attempts to address this for regional crop modelling using field-calibrated parameters. Our study employs six crop phenology models (APSIM, CERES, GDD, Richardson, Sigmoid and Wang) for simulating maturity timings of three representative rice cultivars using trial data within the Sichuan Basin, China. The Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) is applied for model calibration with a global parameter optimization algorithm and evaluation. Calibrated models show robust prediction capabilities during LOOCV with R2 of 0.68–0.95 and RMSE of 2–4 days, though a larger variance is found for evaluation data than for calibration data. Models calibrated with data from sites having frequent high-temperature (Tmax≥32 °C) episodes tend to have better predictability than without high-temperature episodes. Parameter variability, calibrated with different subsets of each cultivar during LOOCV, is low-to-moderate (mostly CV20 %) except for the Sigmoid model´s curve steepness parameter. For the early-maturity cultivar, parameter variability is spatially the main uncertainty factor, relating to its greater variability of site-specific calibrated parameter values. For the medium-maturity and late-maturity cultivars, the dominant uncertainty source arises from the interplay between model structures and parameters. Parameter variability notably influences the overall uncertainty more than the model structure variability across the region, except in areas prone to high-temperature extremes where divergent model responses predominate. These findings highlight the cultivar-specific nature of simulation uncertainty, but also the critical need to assess the spatial distribution of uncertainty sources. For parameter uncertainty, a broader conceptualization is essential for more accurate quantifications of uncertainty sources, paving the way for improved ensemble crop modelling, especially at a large spatial scale.