Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Policy mixes for sustainable development pathways: representation in integrated assessment models

Urheber*innen

Dombrowsky,  Ines
External Organizations;

Iacobuţă,  Gabriela Ileana
External Organizations;

Daioglou,  Vassilis
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/dorothee.keppler

Keppler,  Dorothee
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/bjoern.soergel

Sörgel,  Björn
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Isabelle.Weindl

Weindl,  Isabelle
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Elmar.Kriegler

Kriegler,  Elmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Dombrowsky, I., Iacobuţă, G. I., Daioglou, V., Keppler, D., Sörgel, B., Weindl, I., Kriegler, E. (2025): Policy mixes for sustainable development pathways: representation in integrated assessment models. - Environmental Research Letters, 20, 1, 014030.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad993a


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_31469
Zusammenfassung
The Paris Agreement on climate change and the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development require unprecedented transformations to sustainability, while maximising synergies and minimising trade-offs between the two agendas. The policy studies and sustainability transition literatures suggest that addressing the complex policy interlinkages requires ambitious, coherent, comprehensive and credible policy mixes supported by synergistic combinations of governance modes. We investigate to which extent these assumptions are reflected in quantitative scenarios produced with integrated assessment models. As a case study, we assess a new set of target-seeking sustainable development pathway (SDP) scenarios. We scrutinise the modelling protocols and the scenario results to analyse the extent to which these modelled SDPs represent governance modes and policy instrument types and purposes, and assess the resulting policy mix characteristics. As such, we bridge the scenario modelling and policy mix literatures and provide an initial pathway appraisal. We find that the modelled SDPs use policy mixes to constrain negative side-effects of unmitigated climate measures to achieve several SDGs simultaneously. The policy mixes speak to several policy mix characteristics. However, they are only partially spelled so far and their credibility remains limited. This calls for additional policy-translation efforts.