Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Cascading socio-economic and financial impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war differ across sectors and regions

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/auer

Auer,  Cornelia
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Bosello,  Francesco
External Organizations;

Bressan,  Giacomo
External Organizations;

Delpiazzo,  Elisa
External Organizations;

Monasterolo,  Irene
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/christian.otto

Otto,  Christian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Parrado,  Ramiro
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Reyer

Reyer,  Christopher P. O.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen

https://zenodo.org/records/14647346
(Ergänzendes Material)

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

s43247-025-02119-1.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 3MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Auer, C., Bosello, F., Bressan, G., Delpiazzo, E., Monasterolo, I., Otto, C., Parrado, R., Reyer, C. P. O. (2025): Cascading socio-economic and financial impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war differ across sectors and regions. - Communications Earth and Environment, 6, 194.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02119-1


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32036
Zusammenfassung
Disruptions in global food and energy trade can trigger cascading socio-economic losses. Financial markets can amplify such losses and generate systemic cross-sectoral effects, e.g. food insecurity. Our methodology links the real economy and financial markets to quantify cascading impacts across sectors and regions and to capture amplification effects by financial markets. Although applicable to any shock on global key commodity trade, we test its effectiveness with the Russia-Ukraine war, which reveals pronounced, regionally and sectorally diverse impacts. Comparing with real data confirms that our approach captures several key impacts of the crisis: the energy price increase in Europe, the strong reaction of European commodity future markets with large benefits for fossil companies (equity values up to +54%) and losses for companies most exposed to the belligerents (up to−6%), and the worsening of food affordability especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America (additionally 10 million people at risk of hunger). Our analysis shows the importance of accounting for cascading risks and amplification effects to strengthen economic, financial, and food system resilience.