Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/Xiaoran.Li

Li,  Xiaoran
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

He,  Shutong
External Organizations;

Gu,  Yuen
External Organizations;

Sun,  Yixian
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

s44168-025-00233-6.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 2MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Li, X., He, S., Gu, Y., Sun, Y. (2025): Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era. - npj Climate Action, 4, 30.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00233-6


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32177
Zusammenfassung
As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China would make important contributions to the achievement of the Paris goals if it made economy-wide, strong policy interventions to combat climate change. Despite a growing number of studies on China’s climate governance, the overall landscape of China’s climate policy and its key characteristics remain underexamined. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a dataset of 358 climate-related policies adopted by China’s central government in 2016–2022 and assessed key policy mix characteristics including policy density, balance and intensity. Our findings reveal that higher policy density does not equate to stronger action. Significant variation also exists in alignment with China’s Nationally Determined Contributions, especially in high-emitting sectors. Moreover, despite a relatively balanced mix of regulatory, economic, and informational instruments, this balance does not guarantee intensity. Our study shows challenges in China’s policy coherence and calls for stronger mechanisms to integrate national goals into sectoral policies.