Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Zeitschriftenartikel

Research efforts and gaps in the assessment of forest system resilience: A scoping review

Urheber*innen

Anamaghi,  Sara
External Organizations;

Behboudian,  Massoud
External Organizations;

Emami-Skardi,  Mohammad Javad
External Organizations;

Kåresdotter,  Elisie
External Organizations;

Ferreira,  Carla Sofia Santos
External Organizations;

Destouni,  Georgia
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/lan.wangerlandsson

Wang-Erlandsson,  Lan
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Tengberg,  Anna
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/stenzel

Stenzel,  Fabian       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Fetzer,  Ingo
External Organizations;

Mahjouri,  Najmeh
External Organizations;

Kerachian,  Reza
External Organizations;

Kalantari,  Zahra
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

32746oa.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 3MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Anamaghi, S., Behboudian, M., Emami-Skardi, M. J., Kåresdotter, E., Ferreira, C. S. S., Destouni, G., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Tengberg, A., Stenzel, F., Fetzer, I., Mahjouri, N., Kerachian, R., Kalantari, Z. (2025 online): Research efforts and gaps in the assessment of forest system resilience: A scoping review. - Ambio.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02243-4


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32746
Zusammenfassung
This study investigates how the seven core resilience principles are integrated into assessments of forest system resilience to natural or human-induced disturbances across engineering, ecological, and social-ecological resilience concepts. Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search in the Web of Science database using the keywords “resilience”, “forest” and “ecosystem services” yielded 1828 studies, of which 330 met the selection criteria. The most commonly used criterion was diversity, a sub-criterion of “diversity and redundancy”, appearing in 50% of studies. The results indicate that social and governance-related principles, learning and experimentation (7%), participation (11%), and polycentric governance (9%) have not been frequently addressed. Although numerous studies have employed various principles for assessing forest resilience, none have considered all seven principles jointly. This highlights a significant research gap, emphasising the need to quantify these principles in forest systems. Understanding forest-community dynamics is essential for enhancing the long-term resilience and sustainability of both systems.